Skip to main content

NAT46 considerations
draft-liu-behave-nat46-02

Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (individual)
Expired & archived
Authors Dapeng Liu , DENG Hui
Last updated 2010-03-08
RFC stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state Expired
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:

Abstract

The period of IPv4/IPv6 transisation will last for a long time. Different phases of IPv4/IPv6 transisation have different scenarioes and requirements thus need different solutions. In the early stage of IPv4/IPv6 transisation, sicne the majority of the Internet resources locate in the IPv4 Internet, the main communication type of the IPv4/IPv6 transition is v6 to v4 which is the IPv6 clients iniate communication to the IPv4 servers. At the later stage of the IPv4/ IPv6 transisation, the servers may locate in the IPv6 network/ Internet, in this scenario, there is a need for the legacy IPv4 client to iniate communication to the IPv6 servers. This document analyses the problems of v4 to v6 communication and discusses a solution called PNAT-Lite.

Authors

Dapeng Liu
DENG Hui

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)