IETF Network Slice Topology YANG Data Model
draft-liu-teas-transport-network-slice-yang-06
This document is an Internet-Draft (I-D).
Anyone may submit an I-D to the IETF.
This I-D is not endorsed by the IETF and has no formal standing in the
IETF standards process.
The information below is for an old version of the document.
Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Active".
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Xufeng Liu , Jeff Tantsura , Igor Bryskin , Luis M. Contreras , Qin Wu , Sergio Belotti , Reza Rokui , Aihua Guo , Italo Busi | ||
Last updated | 2023-03-13 | ||
RFC stream | (None) | ||
Formats | |||
Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists | |
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | (None) |
draft-liu-teas-transport-network-slice-yang-06
TEAS Working Group X. Liu Internet-Draft IBM Corporation Intended status: Standards Track J. Tantsura Expires: 14 September 2023 Microsoft I. Bryskin Individual L.M. Contreras Telefonica Q. Wu Huawei S. Belotti Nokia R. Rokui Ciena A. Guo Futurewei I. Busi Huawei 13 March 2023 IETF Network Slice Topology YANG Data Model draft-liu-teas-transport-network-slice-yang-06 Abstract An IETF network slice may use an abstract topology to describe intended underlay for connectivities between slice endpoints. Abstract topologies help the customer to request network slices with shared resources amongst connections, and connections can be activated within the slice as needed. This document describes a YANG data model for managing and controlling abstract topologies for IETF network slices defined in RFC YYYY. [RFC EDITOR NOTE: Please replace RFC YYYY with the RFC number of draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices once it has been published. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Liu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 1] Internet-Draft Network Slice Topology Data Model March 2023 Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on 14 September 2023. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2023 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/ license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.1. Tree Diagram . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.2. Prefixes in Data Node Names . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2. Modeling Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.1. Relationships to Related Topology Models . . . . . . . . 4 2.2. ACTN for Network Slicing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3. Model Applicability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 4. YANG Model Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 5. Model Tree Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 6. YANG Modules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 7. Manageability Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 8. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 9. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 10. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 10.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 10.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Appendix A. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Appendix B. Data Tree for the Example in Section 3.1 . . . . . . 20 B.1. Native Topology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Liu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 2] Internet-Draft Network Slice Topology Data Model March 2023 1. Introduction This document defines a YANG [RFC7950] data model for representing, managing, and controlling IETF network slices as abstract network topologies, where the network slices are defined in [I-D.ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices]. The defined data model is an interface between customers and providers for configurations and state retrievals, so as to support network slicing as a service. Through this model, a customer can learn the slicing capabilities and the available resources of the provider. A customer can request or negotiate with a network slicing provider to create an instance. The customer can incrementally update its requirements on individual topology elements in the slice instance, e.g., adding or removing a node or link, updating desired bandwidth of a link, and retrieve the operational states of these elements. With the help of other mechanisms and data models defined in IETF, the telemetry information can be published to the customer. The YANG model defines technology-agnostic constructs common to network slicing at network layers of different technologies, e.g. IP/MPLS(-TP), OTN and WDM. Therefore, this model may be used as a common base model on which other network slicing models, such as [I-D.ietf-ccamp-yang-otn-slicing], may augments with technology- specific constructs. As described in Section 3 of [I-D.contreras-teas-slice-controller-models], the data model defined in this document complements the data model defined in [I-D.ietf-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang]. In addition to the provider's view, the data model defined in this document models the Type 2 service defined in [RFC8453]. The YANG data model in this document conforms to the Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA) [RFC8342]. 1.1. Tree Diagram Tree diagrams used in this document follow the notation defined in [RFC8340]. 1.2. Prefixes in Data Node Names In this document, names of data nodes and other data model objects are prefixed using the standard prefix associated with the corresponding YANG imported modules, as shown in Table 1. Liu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 3] Internet-Draft Network Slice Topology Data Model March 2023 +==========+=======================+===========+ | Prefix | YANG Module | Reference | +==========+=======================+===========+ | yang | ietf-yang-types | [RFC6991] | +----------+-----------------------+-----------+ | inet | ietf-inet-types | [RFC6991] | +----------+-----------------------+-----------+ | nt | ietf-network-topology | [RFC8345] | +----------+-----------------------+-----------+ | nw | ietf-network-topology | [RFC8345] | +----------+-----------------------+-----------+ | tet | ietf-te-topology | [RFC8795] | +----------+-----------------------+-----------+ | te-types | ietf-te-types | [RFC8776] | +----------+-----------------------+-----------+ | ns-topo | ietf-ns-topo | RFCXXXX | +----------+-----------------------+-----------+ Table 1: Prefixes and Corresponding YANG Modules RFC Editor Note: Please replace XXXX with the RFC number assigned to this document. Please remove this note. 2. Modeling Considerations An IETF network slice topology is modeled as network topology defined in [RFC8345], with augmentations. A new network type "network-slice" is defined in this document. When a network topology data instance contains the network-slice network type, it represents an instance of an IETF network slice topology. 2.1. Relationships to Related Topology Models There are several related YANG data models that have been defined in IETF. Some of these are: Network Topology Model: Defined in [RFC8345]. Network Slicing Model: Defined in [I-D.ietf-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang]. OTN Slicing: Defined in [I-D.ietf-ccamp-yang-otn-slicing]. Figure 1 shows the relationships among these models. The box of dotted lines denotes the model defined in this document. Liu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 4] Internet-Draft Network Slice Topology Data Model March 2023 +----------+ +----------+ | Network | | Network | | Slice | | Topology + | NBI YANG >------+ | Model | | Model | | | RFC 8345 | +----+-----+ | +-----+----+ | | | |augments |references |augments | | | +----^-----+ | ......^..... | OTN | +----------: Network : | Slicing | augments : Slice : | Model >-----------------: Topology : | | : Model : +----------+ '''''''''''' Figure 1: Model Relationships 2.2. ACTN for Network Slicing Since ACTN topology data models are based on the network topology model defined in [RFC8345], the augmentations defined in this document are effective augmentations to the ACTN topology data models, resulting in making the ACTN framework [RFC8453] and data models [I-D.ietf-teas-actn-yang] capable of slicing networks with the required network characteristics. 3. Model Applicability There are many technologies to achieve network slicing. The data model defined in this document can be used to configure resource- based network slices, where the resources of a network slice is represented in the form of an abstract network topology, which can then be mapped to a network resource partition (NRP) according to the scenarios defined in [I-D.ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices]. Network slices may be abstracted differently depending on the requirement contained in the configuration provided by the slice customer. A customer may request a network slice to provide just connectivity between specified endpoints, in which case the network slice can be represented as a set of endpoint-to-endpoint links, with each link formed by an end-to-end tunnel across the underlying transport networks. The resources associated with each link of the slice is reserved and commissioned in the underlying physical network upon the completion of configuring the network slice and all the links are active. Liu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 5] Internet-Draft Network Slice Topology Data Model March 2023 Alternatively a network slice can also be represented as an abstract topology when the customer requests the slice to share resources between multiple endpoints and to use the resources on demand. The abstract topology may consist of virtual nodes and virtual links, and their associated resources are reserved but not commissioned across the underlying transport networks. The customer can later commission resources within the slice dynamically using the NBI provided by the service provider. According to [I-D.ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices], the IETF Network Slice service customer might ask for some level of control of, e.g., to customize the service paths in a network slice. The abstract topology defined in this draft could serve to enable this capability and optimize the resource utilization for network slice connections activated on top of the abstract topology. In the example shown in Figure 2, two network resource partitions are created by the provider to support the two network slice topology requests from the customers. In realizing the network resource partitions, node virtualization is used to separate and allocate resources in physical devices. Two virtual routers VR1 and VR2 are created over physical router R1, and two virtual routers VR3 and VR4 are created over physical router R2, respectively. Each of the virtual routers,as a partition of the physical router, takes a portion of the resources such as ports and memory in the physical router. Depending on the requirements and the implementations, they may share certain resources such as processors, ASICs, and switch fabric. The network slice topology intent requested by the customers is then mapped to a corresponding network resource partition. The provider also reports the operational state of the topology, which shows the resources that are allocated. Customers can process the requested topology and integrate it with their own topology. As an example, Appendix B. shows the JSON encoded data instances of the customer topology intent for Network Slice Blue. Customer Topology (Merged) Customer Topology (Merged) Network Slice Blue Network Slice Red +---+ +---+ +---+ -----|R3 |--- ---|R2 |------|R3 | / +---+ +---+ +---+ +---+ +---+ ^ ^ ^ \ +---+ ---|R1 |------|R2 | | | | -----|R4 |--- +---+ +---+ | | | +---+ ^ ^ v v v ^ | | +---+ +---+ +---+ | Liu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 6] Internet-Draft Network Slice Topology Data Model March 2023 | | -----|VR5|--- ---|VR2|------|VR4| | v v / +---+ +---+ +---+ v +---+ +---+ \ +---+ ---|VR1|------|VR3| -----|VR6|--- +---+ +---+ +---+ Customer Topology (Intended) Customer Topology (Intended) Network Slice Blue Network Slice Red Customers --------------------------------------------------------------------- Provider Customized Topology (Network Resouce Partition) Provider Network with Virtual Devices Network Slice Blue: VR1, VR3, VR5 +---+ ----------|VR5|------ / +---+ +---+ +---+ ------|VR1|---------|VR3| +---+ +---+ ------|VR2|---------|VR4| +---+ +---+ \ +---+ ----------|VR6|------ Network Slice Red: VR2, VR4, VR6 +---+ Virtual Devices --------------------------------------------------------------------- Physical Devices Native Topology Provider Network with Physical Devices +---+ ----------|R3 |------ / +---+ +---+ +---+ ======|R1 |=========|R2 | +---+ +---+ \ +---+ ----------|R4 |------ +---+ Figure 2: Network Slicing Topologies for Virtualization Liu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 7] Internet-Draft Network Slice Topology Data Model March 2023 4. YANG Model Overview The following constructs and attributes are defined within the YANG model: * Network topology, which represent set of shared, reserved resources organized as a virtual topology between all of the endpoints. A customer could use such network topology to define detailed connectivity path traversing the topology, and allow sharing of resources between its multiple endpoint pairs. * Service-level objectives (SLOs) associated with different objects, including node, link, termination point of the topology. 5. Model Tree Structure module: ietf-ns-topo augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:network-types: +--rw network-slice! augment /nw:networks/nw:network: +--rw (slo-sle-policy)? +--:(standard) | +--rw slo-sle-template? leafref +--:(custom) +--rw service-slo-sle-policy +--rw description? string +--rw metric-bounds | +--rw metric-bound* [metric-type] | +--rw metric-type identityref | +--rw metric-unit string | +--rw value-description? string | +--rw percentile-value? percentile | +--rw bound? uint64 +--rw security* identityref +--rw isolation? identityref +--rw max-occupancy-level? uint8 +--rw mtu? uint16 +--rw steering-constraints | +--rw path-constraints | +--rw service-function | +--rw disjointness? | te-types:te-path-disjointness +--rw optimization-criterion? identityref +--rw resize-requirement? identityref +--rw service-info? string augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node: +--rw (slo-sle-policy)? Liu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 8] Internet-Draft Network Slice Topology Data Model March 2023 +--:(standard) | +--rw slo-sle-template? leafref +--:(custom) +--rw service-slo-sle-policy +--rw description? string +--rw metric-bounds | +--rw metric-bound* [metric-type] | +--rw metric-type identityref | +--rw metric-unit string | +--rw value-description? string | +--rw percentile-value? percentile | +--rw bound? uint64 +--rw security* identityref +--rw isolation? identityref +--rw max-occupancy-level? uint8 +--rw mtu? uint16 +--rw steering-constraints | +--rw path-constraints | +--rw service-function | +--rw disjointness? | te-types:te-path-disjointness +--rw optimization-criterion? identityref +--rw resize-requirement? identityref +--rw service-info? string augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node/nt:termination-point: +--rw (slo-sle-policy)? +--:(standard) | +--rw slo-sle-template? leafref +--:(custom) +--rw service-slo-sle-policy +--rw description? string +--rw metric-bounds | +--rw metric-bound* [metric-type] | +--rw metric-type identityref | +--rw metric-unit string | +--rw value-description? string | +--rw percentile-value? percentile | +--rw bound? uint64 +--rw security* identityref +--rw isolation? identityref +--rw max-occupancy-level? uint8 +--rw mtu? uint16 +--rw steering-constraints | +--rw path-constraints | +--rw service-function +--rw optimization-criterion? identityref +--rw resize-requirement? identityref +--rw service-info? string Liu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 9] Internet-Draft Network Slice Topology Data Model March 2023 augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nt:link: +--rw (slo-sle-policy)? +--:(standard) | +--rw slo-sle-template? leafref +--:(custom) +--rw service-slo-sle-policy +--rw description? string +--rw metric-bounds | +--rw metric-bound* [metric-type] | +--rw metric-type identityref | +--rw metric-unit string | +--rw value-description? string | +--rw percentile-value? percentile | +--rw bound? uint64 +--rw security* identityref +--rw isolation? identityref +--rw max-occupancy-level? uint8 +--rw mtu? uint16 +--rw steering-constraints | +--rw path-constraints | +--rw service-function | +--rw disjointness? | te-types:te-path-disjointness +--rw optimization-criterion? identityref +--rw resize-requirement? identityref +--rw service-info? string Figure 3: Tree diagram for network slice topology 6. YANG Modules <CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-ns-topo@2023-03-11.yang" module ietf-ns-topo { yang-version 1.1; namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ns-topo"; prefix "ns-topo"; import ietf-network { prefix "nw"; reference "RFC 8345: A YANG Data Model for Network Topologies"; } import ietf-network-topology { prefix "nt"; reference "RFC 8345: A YANG Data Model for Network Topologies"; } Liu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 10] Internet-Draft Network Slice Topology Data Model March 2023 import ietf-te-types { prefix "te-types"; reference "RFC 8776: Traffic Engineering Common YANG Types"; } import ietf-network-slice-service { prefix "ietf-nss"; reference "draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang-00: IETF Network Slice Service YANG Model"; } organization "IETF CCAMP Working Group"; contact "WG Web: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/ccamp/> WG List: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org> Editor: Xufeng Liu <mailto:xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com> Editor: Italo Busi <mailto:italo.busi@huawei.com> Editor: Aihua Guo <mailto:aihuaguo.ietf@gmail.com> Editor: Sergio Belotti <mailto:sergio.belotti@nokia.com> Editor: Luis M. Contreras <mailto:luismiguel.contrerasmurillo@telefonica.com>"; description "This module defines a base YANG data model for configuring generic network slices in optical transport networks, e.g., Optical Transport Network (OTN). The model fully conforms to the Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA). Copyright (c) 2023 IETF Trust and the persons identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to the license terms contained in, the Revised Liu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 11] Internet-Draft Network Slice Topology Data Model March 2023 BSD License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see the RFC itself for full legal notices."; revision 2023-03-11 { description "Initial revision"; reference "RFC XXXX: IETF Network Slice Topology YANG Data Model"; } /* * Identities */ identity resize-option { description "Base identity for link or connectivity resizing options"; } identity resize-none { base resize-option; description "Not resizable"; } identity resize-with-hit { base resize-option; description "Resizable with traffic hits"; } identity resize-hitless { base resize-option; description "Hitless resizable"; } /* * Groupings */ grouping ns-topo-slo-sle-policy { description "Policy grouping for Transport Network Slices."; Liu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 12] Internet-Draft Network Slice Topology Data Model March 2023 leaf optimization-criterion { type identityref { base te-types:objective-function-type; } description "Optimization criterion applied to this topology."; } leaf resize-requirement { type identityref { base resize-option; } description "Indicates resizing requirments"; } leaf service-info { type string; description "Describe type of services running on the slice. It may be useful information to help the slice controller to optimize resource allocation"; } } grouping ns-topo-steering-constraints { description "Policy grouping for specifying steering constraints for Transport Network Slices."; leaf disjointness { type te-types:te-path-disjointness; description "Indicate the level of disjointness for slice resources."; } } /* * Augmented data nodes */ /* network type augments */ augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:network-types" { description "Defines the Network Slice topology type."; container network-slice { presence "Indicates Network Slice topology"; description "Its presence identifies the Network Slice type."; } Liu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 13] Internet-Draft Network Slice Topology Data Model March 2023 } /* network topology augments */ augment "/nw:networks/nw:network" { when "./nw:network-types/ns-topo:network-slice" { description "Augment only for Network Slice topology."; } description "Augment topology configuration and state."; uses ietf-nss:service-slo-sle-policy; } augment "/nw:networks/nw:network" + "/ns-topo:slo-sle-policy" + "/ns-topo:custom" + "/ns-topo:service-slo-sle-policy" { when "../nw:network-types/ns-topo:network-slice" { description "Augment only for Network Slice topology."; } description "Augment topology configuration and state."; uses ns-topo-slo-sle-policy; } augment "/nw:networks/nw:network" + "/ns-topo:slo-sle-policy" + "/ns-topo:custom" + "/ns-topo:service-slo-sle-policy" + "/ns-topo:steering-constraints" { when "../../nw:network-types/ns-topo:network-slice" { description "Augment only for Network Slice topology."; } description "Augment topology configuration and state."; uses ns-topo-steering-constraints; } /* network node augments */ augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node" { when "../nw:network-types/ns-topo:network-slice" { description "Augment only for Network Slice topology."; } description "Augment node configuration and state."; uses ietf-nss:service-slo-sle-policy; } augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node" + "/ns-topo:slo-sle-policy" + "/ns-topo:custom" + "/ns-topo:service-slo-sle-policy" { when "../../nw:network-types/ns-topo:network-slice" { Liu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 14] Internet-Draft Network Slice Topology Data Model March 2023 description "Augment only for Network Slice topology."; } description "Augment node configuration and state."; uses ns-topo-slo-sle-policy; } augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node" + "/ns-topo:slo-sle-policy" + "/ns-topo:custom" + "/ns-topo:service-slo-sle-policy" + "/ns-topo:steering-constraints" { when "../../../nw:network-types/ns-topo:network-slice" { description "Augment only for Network Slice topology."; } description "Augment IETF network slice services to include steering constraints for nodes."; uses ns-topo-steering-constraints; } /* network node's termination point augments */ augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node" + "/nt:termination-point" { when "../../nw:network-types/ns-topo:network-slice" { description "Augment only for Network Slice topology."; } description "Augment node configuration and state."; uses ietf-nss:service-slo-sle-policy; } augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node" + "/nt:termination-point" + "/ns-topo:slo-sle-policy" + "/ns-topo:custom" + "/ns-topo:service-slo-sle-policy" { when "../../../nw:network-types/ns-topo:network-slice" { description "Augment only for Network Slice topology."; } description "Augment node configuration and state."; uses ns-topo-slo-sle-policy; } /* network link augments */ augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nt:link" { when "../nw:network-types/ns-topo:network-slice" { description "Augment only for Network Slice topology."; Liu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 15] Internet-Draft Network Slice Topology Data Model March 2023 } description "Augment link configuration and state."; uses ietf-nss:service-slo-sle-policy; } augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nt:link" + "/ns-topo:slo-sle-policy" + "/ns-topo:custom" + "/ns-topo:service-slo-sle-policy" { when "../../nw:network-types/ns-topo:network-slice" { description "Augment only for Network Slice topology."; } description "Augment link configuration and state."; uses ns-topo-slo-sle-policy; } augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nt:link" + "/ns-topo:slo-sle-policy" + "/ns-topo:custom" + "/ns-topo:service-slo-sle-policy" + "/ns-topo:steering-constraints" { when "../../../nw:network-types/ns-topo:network-slice" { description "Augment only for Network Slice topology."; } description "Augment IETF network slice services to include steering constraints for links within a resource-based transport network slice."; uses ns-topo-steering-constraints; } } <CODE ENDS> Figure 4: YANG model for network slice topology 7. Manageability Considerations To ensure the security and controllability of physical resource isolation, slice-based independent operation and management are required to achieve management isolation. Each network slice typically requires dedicated accounts, permissions, and resources for independent access and O&M. This mechanism is to guarantee the information isolation among slice tenants and to avoid resource conflicts. The access to slice management functions will only be permitted after successful security checks. Liu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 16] Internet-Draft Network Slice Topology Data Model March 2023 8. Security Considerations The YANG module specified in this document defines a schema for data that is designed to be accessed via network management protocols such as NETCONF [RFC6241] or RESTCONF [RFC8040]. The lowest NETCONF layer is the secure transport layer, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is Secure Shell (SSH) [RFC6242]. The lowest RESTCONF layer is HTTPS, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is TLS [RFC8446]. The NETCONF access control model [RFC8341] provides the means to restrict access for particular NETCONF or RESTCONF users to a preconfigured subset of all available NETCONF or RESTCONF protocol operations and content. There are a number of data nodes defined in this YANG module that are writable/creatable/deletable (i.e., config true, which is the default). These data nodes may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. Write operations (e.g., edit-config) to these data nodes without proper protection can have a negative effect on network operations. Considerations in Section 8 of [RFC8795] are also applicable to their subtrees in the module defined in this document. Some of the readable data nodes in this YANG module may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. It is thus important to control read access (e.g., via get, get-config, or notification) to these data nodes. Considerations in Section 8 of [RFC8795] are also applicable to their subtrees in the module defined in this document. 9. IANA Considerations It is proposed to IANA to assign new URIs from the "IETF XML Registry" [RFC3688] as follows: URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ns-topo Registrant Contact: The IESG XML: N/A; the requested URI is an XML namespace. This document registers a YANG module in the YANG Module Names registry [RFC6020]. name: ietf-ns-topo namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ns-topo prefix: ns-topo reference: RFC XXXX Liu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 17] Internet-Draft Network Slice Topology Data Model March 2023 10. References 10.1. Normative References [RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688, DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688>. [RFC6020] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020, DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6020>. [RFC6241] Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241>. [RFC6242] Wasserman, M., "Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure Shell (SSH)", RFC 6242, DOI 10.17487/RFC6242, June 2011, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6242>. [RFC6991] Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., "Common YANG Data Types", RFC 6991, DOI 10.17487/RFC6991, July 2013, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6991>. [RFC7950] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language", RFC 7950, DOI 10.17487/RFC7950, August 2016, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7950>. [RFC7951] Lhotka, L., "JSON Encoding of Data Modeled with YANG", RFC 7951, DOI 10.17487/RFC7951, August 2016, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7951>. [RFC8040] Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, January 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8040>. [RFC8340] Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, Ed., "YANG Tree Diagrams", BCP 215, RFC 8340, DOI 10.17487/RFC8340, March 2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8340>. [RFC8341] Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "Network Configuration Access Control Model", STD 91, RFC 8341, DOI 10.17487/RFC8341, March 2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8341>. Liu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 18] Internet-Draft Network Slice Topology Data Model March 2023 [RFC8342] Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., Shafer, P., Watsen, K., and R. Wilton, "Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA)", RFC 8342, DOI 10.17487/RFC8342, March 2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8342>. [RFC8345] Clemm, A., Medved, J., Varga, R., Bahadur, N., Ananthakrishnan, H., and X. Liu, "A YANG Data Model for Network Topologies", RFC 8345, DOI 10.17487/RFC8345, March 2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8345>. [RFC8446] Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August 2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8446>. [RFC8776] Saad, T., Gandhi, R., Liu, X., Beeram, V., and I. Bryskin, "Common YANG Data Types for Traffic Engineering", RFC 8776, DOI 10.17487/RFC8776, June 2020, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8776>. [RFC8795] Liu, X., Bryskin, I., Beeram, V., Saad, T., Shah, H., and O. Gonzalez de Dios, "YANG Data Model for Traffic Engineering (TE) Topologies", RFC 8795, DOI 10.17487/RFC8795, August 2020, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8795>. 10.2. Informative References [I-D.contreras-teas-slice-controller-models] Contreras, L. M., Rokui, R., Tantsura, J., Wu, B., Liu, X., Dhody, D., and S. Belotti, "IETF Network Slice Controller and its associated data models", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-contreras-teas-slice- controller-models-04, 24 October 2022, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-contreras- teas-slice-controller-models-04>. [I-D.ietf-ccamp-yang-otn-slicing] Guo, A., Contreras, L. M., Belotti, S., Rokui, R., Xu, Y., Zhao, Y., and X. Liu, "Framework and Data Model for OTN Network Slicing", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft- ietf-ccamp-yang-otn-slicing-03, 24 October 2022, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ccamp- yang-otn-slicing-03>. [I-D.ietf-teas-actn-yang] Lee, Y., Zheng, H., Ceccarelli, D., Yoon, B. Y., and S. Belotti, "Applicability of YANG models for Abstraction and Control of Traffic Engineered Networks", Work in Progress, Liu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 19] Internet-Draft Network Slice Topology Data Model March 2023 Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-teas-actn-yang-11, 7 March 2023, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf- teas-actn-yang-11>. [I-D.ietf-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang] Wu, B., Dhody, D., Rokui, R., Saad, T., Han, L., and J. Mullooly, "A YANG Data Model for the IETF Network Slice Service", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf- teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang-04, 13 March 2023, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-teas- ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang-04>. [I-D.ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices] Farrel, A., Drake, J., Rokui, R., Homma, S., Makhijani, K., Contreras, L. M., and J. Tantsura, "A Framework for IETF Network Slices", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices-19, 21 January 2023, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-teas- ietf-network-slices-19>. [RFC8453] Ceccarelli, D., Ed. and Y. Lee, Ed., "Framework for Abstraction and Control of TE Networks (ACTN)", RFC 8453, DOI 10.17487/RFC8453, August 2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8453>. Appendix A. Acknowledgments The TEAS Network Slicing Design Team (NSDT) members included Aijun Wang, Dong Jie, Eric Gray, Jari Arkko, Jeff Tantsura, John E Drake, Luis M. Contreras, Rakesh Gandhi, Ran Chen, Reza Rokui, Ricard Vilalta, Ron Bonica, Sergio Belotti, Tomonobu Niwa, Xuesong Geng, and Xufeng Liu. Appendix B. Data Tree for the Example in Section 3.1 B.1. Native Topology This section contains an example of an instance data tree in the JSON encoding [RFC7951]. The example instantiates "ietf-network" for the topology of Network Slice Blue depicted in Figure 2. =============== NOTE: '\' line wrapping per RFC 8792 ================ { "ietf-network:networks": { "network": [ { "network-id": "example-customized-blue-topology", Liu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 20] Internet-Draft Network Slice Topology Data Model March 2023 "network-types": { "ietf-ns-topo:network-slice": { } }, "node": [ { "node-id": "VR1", "ietf-ns-topo:service-slo-sle-policy": { "isolation": "ietf-network-slice-service:service-isola\ tion-dedicated", "resize-requirement": "resize-hitless" }, "ietf-network-topology:termination-point": [ { "tp-id": "1-0-1" }, { "tp-id": "1-3-1" } ] }, { "node-id": "VR3", "ietf-ns-topo:service-slo-sle-policy": { "isolation": "ietf-network-slice-service:service-isola\ tion-shared", "resize-requirement": "resize-hitless" }, "ietf-network-topology:termination-point": [ { "tp-id": "3-1-1" }, { "tp-id": "3-5-1" } ] }, { "node-id": "VR5", "ietf-ns-topo:service-slo-sle-policy": { "isolation": "ietf-network-slice-service:service-isola\ tion-shared", "resize-requirement": "resize-hitless" }, "ietf-network-topology:termination-point": [ { "tp-id": "5-3-1" }, Liu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 21] Internet-Draft Network Slice Topology Data Model March 2023 { "tp-id": "5-0-1" } ] } ], "ietf-network-topology:link": [ { "link-id": "VR1,1-0-1,,", "source": { "source-node": "VR1", "source-tp": "1-0-1" }, "ietf-ns-topo:service-slo-sle-policy": { "metric-bounds": { "metric-bound": [ { "metric-type": "ietf-network-slice-service:servi\ ce-slo-two-way-delay", "metric-unit": "ms", "bound": 60 } ] }, "isolation": "ietf-network-slice-service:service-isola\ tion-shared" } }, { "link-id": ",,VR1,1-0-1", "destination": { "dest-node": "VR1", "dest-tp": "1-0-1" }, "ietf-ns-topo:service-slo-sle-policy": { "metric-bounds": { "metric-bound": [ { "metric-type": "ietf-network-slice-service:servi\ ce-slo-two-way-delay", "metric-unit": "ms", "bound": 60 } ] }, "isolation": "ietf-network-slice-service:service-isola\ tion-dedicated" } Liu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 22] Internet-Draft Network Slice Topology Data Model March 2023 }, { "link-id": "VR1,1-3-1,VR3,3-1-1", "source": { "source-node": "VR1", "source-tp": "1-3-1" }, "destination": { "dest-node": "VR3", "dest-tp": "3-1-1" }, "ietf-ns-topo:service-slo-sle-policy": { "metric-bounds": { "metric-bound": [ { "metric-type": "ietf-network-slice-service:servi\ ce-slo-two-way-delay", "metric-unit": "ms", "bound": 30 } ] }, "isolation": "ietf-network-slice-service:service-isola\ tion-dedicated" } }, { "link-id": "VR3,3-1-1,VR1,1-3-1", "source": { "source-node": "VR3", "source-tp": "3-1-1" }, "destination": { "dest-node": "R1", "dest-tp": "1-3-1" }, "ietf-ns-topo:service-slo-sle-policy": { "metric-bounds": { "metric-bound": [ { "metric-type": "ietf-network-slice-service:servi\ ce-slo-two-way-delay", "metric-unit": "ms", "bound": 30 } ] }, "isolation": "ietf-network-slice-service:service-isola\ Liu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 23] Internet-Draft Network Slice Topology Data Model March 2023 tion-dedicated" } }, { "link-id": "VR3,3-5-1,VR5,5-3-1", "source": { "source-node": "VR3", "source-tp": "3-5-1" }, "destination": { "dest-node": "VR5", "dest-tp": "5-3-1" }, "ietf-ns-topo:service-slo-sle-policy": { "metric-bounds": { "metric-bound": [ { "metric-type": "ietf-network-slice-service:servi\ ce-slo-two-way-delay", "metric-unit": "ms", "bound": 35 } ] }, "isolation": "ietf-network-slice-service:service-isola\ tion-dedicated" } }, { "link-id": "VR5,5-3-1,VR3,3-5-1", "source": { "source-node": "VR5", "source-tp": "5-3-1" }, "destination": { "dest-node": "VR3", "dest-tp": "3-5-1" }, "ietf-ns-topo:service-slo-sle-policy": { "metric-bounds": { "metric-bound": [ { "metric-type": "ietf-network-slice-service:servi\ ce-slo-two-way-delay", "metric-unit": "ms", "bound": 35 } ] Liu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 24] Internet-Draft Network Slice Topology Data Model March 2023 }, "isolation": "ietf-network-slice-service:service-isola\ tion-dedicated" } }, { "link-id": "VR5,5-0-1,,", "source": { "source-node": "VR5", "source-tp": "5-0-1" }, "ietf-ns-topo:service-slo-sle-policy": { "metric-bounds": { "metric-bound": [ { "metric-type": "ietf-network-slice-service:servi\ ce-slo-two-way-delay", "metric-unit": "ms", "bound": 25 } ] }, "isolation": "ietf-network-slice-service:service-isola\ tion-dedicated" } }, { "link-id": ",,VR5,5-0-1", "destination": { "dest-node": "VR5", "dest-tp": "5-0-1" }, "ietf-ns-topo:service-slo-sle-policy": { "metric-bounds": { "metric-bound": [ { "metric-type": "ietf-network-slice-service:servi\ ce-slo-two-way-delay", "metric-unit": "ms", "bound": 25 } ] }, "isolation": "ietf-network-slice-service:service-isola\ tion-dedicated" } } ], Liu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 25] Internet-Draft Network Slice Topology Data Model March 2023 "ietf-ns-topo:service-slo-sle-policy": { "isolation": "ietf-network-slice-service:service-isolation\ -dedicated", "optimization-criterion": "ietf-te-types:of-minimize-cost-\ path" } } ] } } Authors' Addresses Xufeng Liu IBM Corporation Email: xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com Jeff Tantsura Microsoft Email: jefftant.ietf@gmail.com Igor Bryskin Individual Email: i_bryskin@yahoo.com Luis M. Contreras Telefonica Email: luismiguel.contrerasmurillo@telefonica.com Qin Wu Huawei Email: bill.wu@huawei.com Sergio Belotti Nokia Email: Sergio.belotti@nokia.com Reza Rokui Ciena Email: rrokui@ciena.com Liu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 26] Internet-Draft Network Slice Topology Data Model March 2023 Aihua Guo Futurewei Email: aihuaguo.ietf@gmail.com Italo Busi Huawei Email: italo.busi@huawei.com Liu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 27]