Pros and Cons of IPv6 Transition Technologies for IPv4aaS
draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison-06
| Document | Type | Replaced Internet-Draft (v6ops WG) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Gábor Lencse , Jordi Palet Martinez , Lee Howard , Richard Patterson , Ian Farrer | ||
| Last updated | 2021-04-06 (Latest revision 2021-01-09) | ||
| Replaced by | draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-comparison | ||
| Stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
plain text
xml
htmlized
pdfized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | WG state | Candidate for WG Adoption | |
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-comparison | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison-06.txt
Abstract
Several IPv6 transition technologies have been developed to provide customers with IPv4-as-a-Service (IPv4aaS) for ISPs with an IPv6-only access and/or core network. All these technologies have their advantages and disadvantages, and depending on existing topology, skills, strategy and other preferences, one of these technologies may be the most appropriate solution for a network operator. This document examines the five most prominent IPv4aaS technologies considering a number of different aspects to provide network operators with an easy to use reference to assist in selecting the technology that best suits their needs.
Authors
Gábor Lencse
Jordi Palet Martinez
Lee Howard
Richard Patterson
Ian Farrer
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)