ICANN Registry Interfaces
draft-lozano-icann-registry-interfaces-17
| Document | Type | Active Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Gustavo Lozano Ibarra , Eduardo Alvarez | ||
| Last updated | 2022-03-22 | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | plain text htmlized pdfized bibtex | ||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
draft-lozano-icann-registry-interfaces-17
Internet Engineering Task Force G. Lozano
Internet-Draft E. Alvarez
Intended status: Informational ICANN
Expires: September 21, 2022 Mar 20, 2022
ICANN Registry Interfaces
draft-lozano-icann-registry-interfaces-17
Abstract
This document describes the technical details of the interfaces
provided by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
(ICANN) to its contracted parties to fulfill reporting requirements.
The interfaces provided by ICANN to Data Escrow Agents and Registry
Operators to fulfill the requirements of Specifications 2 and 3 of
the gTLD Base Registry Agreement are described in this document.
Additionally, interfaces for retrieving the IP addresses of the probe
nodes used in the SLA Monitoring System (SLAM) and interfaces for
supporting maintenance window objects are described in this document.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on September 21, 2022.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.1. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.2. Date and Time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.3. Common elements used in this specification . . . . . . . 4
1.4. Object Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2. Interfaces for Specification 2 - Data Escrow Reporting . . . 11
2.1. Registry Operator Reporting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
2.2. Data Escrow Agent Reporting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.3. Monitoring the reporting status . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
3. Interfaces of Specification 3 - Registry Operator Monthly
Reporting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
3.1. Per-Registrar Transactions Report . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
3.2. Registry Functions Activity Report . . . . . . . . . . . 17
3.3. Monitoring the reporting status . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
4. Maintenance Windows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
4.1. Creating and updating a maintenance window . . . . . . . 19
4.2. Deleting a maintenance window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
4.3. Getting the persisted data for a maintenance window . . . 20
4.4. Getting a list of maintenance windows . . . . . . . . . . 20
5. Interfaces for the SLAM Probe Node List . . . . . . . . . . . 21
6. Technical details of the interfaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
6.1. General technical details . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
6.2. Specific technical details . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
7. Formal Syntax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
7.1. RRI IIRDEA Result Schema . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
7.2. RRI Report Object . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
7.3. RRI Notification Object . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
7.4. RRI Reporting Summary Object . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
7.5. RRI Notifications Object . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
7.6. RRI Reports Object . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
7.7. Maintenance Window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
7.8. SLAM Probe Node List . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
8. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
9. Change History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
9.1. Version 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
9.2. Version 01 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
9.3. Version 02 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
9.4. Version 03 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
9.5. Version 04 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
9.6. Version 05 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
9.7. Version 06 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
9.8. Version 07 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
9.9. Version 08 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
9.10. Version 09 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
9.11. Version 10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
9.12. Version 11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
9.13. Version 12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
9.14. Version 13 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
9.15. Version 14 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
9.16. Version 15 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
9.17. Version 16 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
9.18. Version 17 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
10. Internationalization Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
11. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
12. Implementation Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
12.1. Implementation in the gTLD space . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
13. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
14. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
14.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
14.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
1. Introduction
This document describes the technical details of the interfaces
provided by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
(ICANN) to other contracted parties to fulfill reporting
requirements. The interface provided by ICANN to Registry Operators
and Data Escrow Agents to fulfill the requirements of Specifications
2 and 3 of the gTLD Base Registry Agreement [ICANN-GTLD-RA-20170731]
are described in this document. Additionally, interfaces for
retrieving the IP addresses of the probe nodes used in the SLA
Monitoring System (SLAM) and interfaces for supporting maintenance
window objects are described in this document.
Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 as described in
[W3C.REC-xml-20081126] and XML Schema notation as described in
[W3C.REC-xmlschema-1-20041028] and [W3C.REC-xmlschema-2-20041028] are
used in this specification.
The provisioning of credentials and authentication methods used in
the interfaces are outside of this document's scope.
1.1. Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.
XML is case sensitive. Unless stated otherwise, XML specifications
and examples provided in this document MUST be interpreted in the
character case presented to develop a conforming implementation.
1.2. Date and Time
Numerous fields indicate "date and time", such as the creation and
receipt dates for data escrow deposits. These fields SHALL contain
timestamps indicating the date and time in UTC as specified in
[RFC3339], with no offset from the zero meridian.
1.3. Common elements used in this specification
Common elements used in this specification are explained in this
section.
o <base-url>: The base URL used in the reporting interfaces examples
must be replaced with the URL indicated by ICANN.
1.4. Object Description
This section describes the base objects supported by this
specification.
1.4.1. <iirdea:result> object
The ICANN interfaces for registries and data escrow agents (IIRDEA)
<iirdea:result> object is used to provide information on the result
of a verification process when interacting with the interfaces. The
XML Schema for the <iirdea:result> object can be found in
Section 7.1.
The <iirdea:result> object contains the following attributes and
child elements:
o A "code" attribute whose value is a four-digit decimal number that
identifies the result of a process. Available result code values
MUST be defined for the corresponding process.
o An OPTIONAL "domainCount" attribute indicates the number of domain
names related to the reported result.
o A <msg> element contains a human-readable description of the
result code.
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
o An OPTIONAL <description> element that includes additional details
on the result conditions.
An example of a <iirdea:result> object is presented below:
<result code="2001">
<msg>The structure of the report is invalid.</msg>
<description>
'XX' could not be parsed as a number (line: 2 column:3)
</description>
</result>
1.4.2. <rdeReport:report> object
The contents of a data escrow deposit are described using a
<rdeReport:report> object. The XML Schema for the <rdeReport:report>
object can be found in Section 7.2.
The <rdeReport:report> object contains the following child elements:
o An <id> element that contains the identifier assigned to this
report. The report identifier MUST be the same as the "id"
attribute from the <deposit>. If the data escrow deposit does not
include a unique identifier, the Data Escrow Agent MUST generate a
unique identifier to reference the data escrow deposit and use it
in the <id> element.
o A <version> element contains the version of the specification
used. This value MUST be 1.
o A <rydeSpecEscrow> element contains the version of the Data Escrow
Specification (e.g., RFC8909) used to create the deposit. After
the specification is published as an RFC, the value MUST be the
RFC number assigned by IANA.
o An OPTIONAL <rydeSpecMapping> element contains the version of the
Domain Name Registration Data (DNRD) Objects Mapping (e.g.,
RFC9022) used to create the deposit. After the specification is
published as an RFC, the value MUST be the RFC number assigned by
IANA. The <rydeSpecMapping> element MUST be included if the
deposit was created using any version of the DNRD objects mapping
specification (see [RFC9022]).
o A <resend> element contains the value of the "resend" attribute of
the <deposit>.
o A <crDate> element contains the date and time that the Registry
Operator created the deposit.
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
o A <kind> element is used to identify the kind of deposit: FULL,
INCR (Incremental), or DIFF (Differential).
o A <watermark> element contains the date and time corresponding to
the Timeline Watermark (<watermark> element) of the <deposit>.
o A <rdeHeader:header> element contains the header of the <deposit>
as defined in [RFC9022].
An example of a <rdeReport:report> object is available in
Section 2.1.
1.4.3. <rdeNotification:notification> object
The <rdeNotification:notification> object is used by Data Escrow
Agents to document the result of the data escrow deposit verification
process. The XML Schema for the <rdeNotification:notification>
object can be found in Section 7.3.
The <rdeNotification:notification> object contains the following
child elements:
o A <deaName> element contains the name of the Data Escrow Agent.
o A <version> element contains the version of the specification
used. This value MUST be 1.
o A <repDate> element contains the reported date. In the case of a
DVPN or DVFN notification, this value MUST be the date of the
<watermark> element of the <deposit>. In the case of a DRFN
deposit notification, this value MUST be the date for which no
deposit was received from the Registrar or Registry Operator.
o A <status> element is used to specify the status of <repDate>.
The possible values of status are DVPN, DVFN, and DRFN. The three
types of notices determine the value for the <status> element:
* Deposit Receipt Failure Notice (DRFN): generated by the Data
Escrow Agent when no deposit is received according to the data
escrow deposit schedule.
* Deposit Verification Failure Notice (DVFN): generated by the
Data Escrow Agent when a deposit is received, but the final
result of the verification process is a failure.
* Deposit Verification Pass Notice (DVPN): generated by the Data
Escrow Agent when a deposit is received, and the final result
of the verification process is a success.
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
o An OPTIONAL <results> element contains the errors detected during
the data escrow deposit verification process performed by the Data
Escrow Agent. The <results> element includes one or more
<iirdea:result> elements as defined in Section 1.4.1. In the case
of a DRFN or DVPN deposit notification, the <results> element MUST
NOT be present.
o An OPTIONAL <reDate> element contains the date and time that the
Data Escrow Agent successfully received the deposit. In the case
of a DRFN deposit notification, this element MUST NOT be present.
o An OPTIONAL <vaDate> element contains the date and time that the
Data Escrow Agent processed the deposit for validation. In the
case of a DRFN deposit notification, this element MUST NOT be
present.
o An OPTIONAL <lastFullDate> element contains the date of the
Timeline Watermark (<watermark> element) of the most recent FULL
deposit that the Data Escrow Agent successfully validated. This
element MUST NOT be present if a successfully validated full
deposit has never been deposited.
o An OPTIONAL <rdeReport:report> element is used by the Data Escrow
Agent to provide extended information about the deposit. In the
case of a DRFN deposit notification, this element MUST NOT be
present. In the case of a DVPN or DVFN deposit notification, this
element MUST be present. When this element is present, the
<rdeHeader:header> element MUST be generated by the Data Escrow
Agent for the Timeline Watermark (<watermark> element) of the
deposit being processed. If the deposit being processed is a
differential or incremental deposit, the Data Escrow Agent MUST
create a dataset by following Section 5.2 of [RFC8909] to generate
the <rdeHeader:header> element.
o Note: In the case of a DVPN or DVFN deposit notification, the <id>
is used as a unique identifier.
An example of a <rdeNotification:notification> object is available in
Section 2.2.
1.4.4. <rriReporting:summary> Object
Interfaces that support monitoring the reporting status for a
specific repository provide a <rriReporting:summary> object as
defined by the schema in Section 7.4 in the HTTP Entity-body when a
HTTP/200 code is sent by the interface.
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
The <rriReporting:summary> element includes the following child
elements:
o A choice of one of the elements as defined in the
"rdeHeader:repositoryTypeGroup" (see [RFC9022]) that indicates the
unique identifier for the repository being escrowed.
o A <creationDate> element with the date and time in which the
queried repository was created in the system.
o A <depositSchedule> OPTIONAL element indicating the current Data
Escrow Deposit schedule for the queried repository. Possible
values are "None", "Weekly", and "Daily".
o An OPTIONAL <lastFullDate> element indicating the date of the
Timeline Watermark (<watermark> element) of the most recent FULL
deposit that was successfully validated for the queried repository
as notified by the Data Escrow Agent.
o A <statusReports> element with a <statusReport> element for each
report type for the queried repository. Each <statusReport>
element includes the following child elements:
* <type>: a string value indicating the report type to which the
information provided pertains.
* <enabled>: a boolean value indicating if the report type is
enabled for the repository.
* <status>: a string value indicating the reporting status. A
value of "ok" indicates no reporting issues in the
corresponding report type, otherwise the value of
"unsatisfactory" is shown.
* An OPTIONAL <issues> element included only when the <status>
element has a value of "unsatisfactory", and includes an empty
<issue> element for each date with a reporting problem found in
the corresponding report type. Each <issue> element includes a
REQUIRED "date" attribute in "YYYY-MM-DD" format and a REQUIRED
"description" attribute to describe the issue. The possible
values to describe each reporting issue are:
+ "Missing_Deposit_Full": If the latest notification received
from the Data Escrow Agent for the date indicates that a
scheduled "Full" deposit was not submitted by the repository
owner.
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
+ "Missing_Deposit_Diff": If the latest notification received
from the Data Escrow Agent for the date indicates that a
scheduled "Differential" deposit was not submitted by the
repository owner.
+ "Invalid_Deposit_Full": If the latest notification received
from the Data Escrow Agent for the date indicates that a
"Full" deposit was received by the Data Escrow Agent, but
failed the verification process.
+ "Invalid_Deposit_Diff": If the latest notification received
from the Data Escrow Agent for the date indicates that a
"Differential" deposit was received by the Data Escrow
Agent, but failed the verification process.
+ "No_Report_Received" If no report has been received for the
date.
o A <timestamp> element to indicate the date and time the reporting
status response was created.
1.4.5. <rdeReports:reports> Object
Interfaces that support monitoring and retrieving Data Escrow Reports
received, provide a <rdeReports:reports> object as defined by the
schema in Section 7.6 in the HTTP Entity-body when an HTTP/200 code
is sent by the interface.
The <rdeReports:reports> element includes a list of
<rdeReports:receivedReport> objects, one for each <rdeReport:report>
successfully received by ICANN.
Each <rdeReports:receivedReport> object includes the following child
elements:
o A <received> element to indicate the date and time in which ICANN
received the report.
o A <rdeReport:report> element as defined in Section 1.4.2 as
received by ICANN.
1.4.6. <rdeNotifications:notifications> Object
Interfaces that support monitoring and retrieving Data Escrow
Notifications received from Data Escrow Agents, provide a
<rdeNotifications:notifications> object as defined by the schema in
Section 7.5 in the HTTP Entity-body when an HTTP/200 code is sent by
the interface.
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
The <rdeNotifications:notifications> element includes a list of
<rdeNotifications:receivedNotification> objects, one for each
<rdeNotification:notification> successfully received by ICANN.
Each <rdeNotifications:receivedNotification> object includes the
following child elements:
o A <received> element to indicate the date and time in which ICANN
received the notification.
o A <rdeNotification:notification> element as defined in
Section 1.4.3 as received by ICANN.
1.4.7. <schedule:schedule> object
The <schedule:schedule> object is used to provide details of an
instance of a maintenance window. The maintenance window is
identified by a Universally Unique IDentifier version 4 (see
[RFC4122]) captured in the attribute "scheduleId". An additional
attribute "enabled" defined as a boolean can be used to enable (value
of true) or disable (value of false) the maintenance window. The XML
Schema for the <schedule:schedule> object can be found in
Section 7.7.
The <schedule:schedule> object contains the following child elements:
o A <name> element contains a descriptive name of the maintenance
window.
o A <description> element contains a description of the maintenance
window.
o A <version> element contains the version of the specification
used. This value MUST be 1.
o A <startTime> element contains the date and time when the
maintenance window starts being active.
o A <endTime> element contains the date and time when the
maintenance window ends being active.
An example of a <schedule:schedule> object is available in Section 4.
1.4.8. <schedule:schedules> object
The <schedule:schedules> object is used to provide the list of
maintenance window objects. The XML Schema for the
<schedule:schedules> object can be found in Section 7.7.
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
The <schedule:schedules> object contains the following child
elements:
o Zero or more <schedule:schedule> elements. See, Section 1.4.7 for
the definition of <schedule:schedule>.
An example of a <schedule:schedules> object is available in
Section 4.
1.4.9. <probeNode:probeNodes> object
The <probeNode:probeNodes> object is used to provide the list of
probe nodes used by the SLA Monitoring System. The XML Schema for
the <probeNode:probeNodes> object can be found in Section 7.8.
The <probeNode:probeNodes> object contains the following child
elements:
o One or more <probeNode> elements. Each <probeNode> element
contains the following child elements:
* A <city> element contains the name of the city where the node
is located.
* One or more <addr> element contains the IP addresses used in
the node to originate test connections. An "ip" attribute
contains the string "v4" if the IP address is an IPv4 address
or "v6" if the IP address is an IPv6 address.
o A <updateTime> element contains the date and time of the last
update of the list.
o A <version> element contains the version of the specification
used. This value MUST be 1.
An example of a <probeNode:probeNodes> object is available in
Section 5.
2. Interfaces for Specification 2 - Data Escrow Reporting
This section describes the interfaces provided by ICANN to Registry
Operators and Data Escrow Agents to fulfill the reporting
requirements detailed in Specification 2 of the gTLD Base Registry
Agreement [ICANN-GTLD-RA-20170731].
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
2.1. Registry Operator Reporting
The gTLD Base Registry Agreement [ICANN-GTLD-RA-20170731],
Specification 2, Part A, Section 7 requires Registry Operators to
provide ICANN with a written statement that includes a copy of the
report generated upon creation of a deposit and a statement that the
deposit has been inspected by the Registry Operator and is complete
and accurate.
In order to satisfy this requirement, the Registry Operator sends to
ICANN a <rdeReport:report> object as defined in Section 1.4.2 for
each deposit successfully sent to the Data Escrow Agent, using the
PUT HTTP verb in the interface provided by ICANN at:
<base-url>/report/registry-escrow-report/<tld>/<id>
Where:
* <tld> MUST be substituted by the TLD for which the report is
being provided. In the case of an IDN TLD, the A-label (see
[RFC5890]) MUST be used.
* <id> MUST be substituted by the identifier assigned to this
report, which MUST be the same as the "id" attribute from the
<deposit>.
Note: the interface supports overwriting the information of a
particular report <id> to support asynchronous interfaces between
Registry Operators and Data Escrow Agents.
Example of a <rdeReport:report> object for a data escrow deposit
corresponding to a TLD Registry repository:
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdeReport:report
xmlns:rdeReport="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeReport-1.0"
xmlns:rdeHeader="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeHeader-1.0">
<rdeReport:id>20101017001</rdeReport:id>
<rdeReport:version>1</rdeReport:version>
<rdeReport:rydeSpecEscrow>
RFC8909
</rdeReport:rydeSpecEscrow>
<rdeReport:rydeSpecMapping>
RFC9022
</rdeReport:rydeSpecMapping>
<rdeReport:resend>0</rdeReport:resend>
<rdeReport:crDate>2010-10-17T00:15:00.0Z</rdeReport:crDate>
<rdeReport:kind>FULL</rdeReport:kind>
<rdeReport:watermark>2010-10-17T00:00:00Z</rdeReport:watermark>
<rdeHeader:header>
<rdeHeader:tld>test</rdeHeader:tld>
<rdeHeader:count
uri="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeDomain-1.0">2</rdeHeader:count>
<rdeHeader:count
uri="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeHost-1.0">1</rdeHeader:count>
<rdeHeader:count
uri="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeContact-1.0">1</rdeHeader:count>
<rdeHeader:count
uri="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeRegistrar-1.0">1
</rdeHeader:count>
<rdeHeader:count
uri="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeIDN-1.0">1</rdeHeader:count>
<rdeHeader:count
uri="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeNNDN-1.0">1</rdeHeader:count>
<rdeHeader:count
uri="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeEppParams-1.0">1
</rdeHeader:count>
</rdeHeader:header>
</rdeReport:report>
2.2. Data Escrow Agent Reporting
The gTLD Base Registry Agreement [ICANN-GTLD-RA-20170731],
Specification 2, Part B, Section 7 requires Data Escrow Agents to
deliver ICANN with a notification object every time a successfully
processed deposit is received from the Registry Operator regardless
of the final status of the verification process.
To satisfy this requirement, the Data Escrow Agent sends to ICANN a
<rdeNotification:notification> object as defined in Section 1.4.3,
using the POST HTTP verb in the interface provided by ICANN at:
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
<base-url>/report/escrow-agent-notification/<tld>
Where:
* <tld> MUST be substituted by the TLD for which the notification
is being provided. In the case of an IDN TLD, the A-label (see
[RFC5890]) MUST be used.
If by 23:59:59 UTC, a deposit has not been successfully processed
regardless of the final status of the verification process, a
<rdeNotification:notification> object with DRFN status MUST be sent
to ICANN.
Example of a <rdeNotification:notification> object of a Data Escrow
Agent notification corresponding to a Registry repository Data Escrow
Deposit:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdeNotification:notification
xmlns:rdeNotification="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeNotification-1.0"
xmlns:rdeReport="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeReport-1.0"
xmlns:rdeHeader="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeHeader-1.0">
<rdeNotification:deaName>Escrow Agent Inc.</rdeNotification:deaName>
<rdeNotification:version>1</rdeNotification:version>
<rdeNotification:repDate>2010-10-17</rdeNotification:repDate>
<rdeNotification:status>DVPN</rdeNotification:status>
<rdeNotification:reDate>
2010-10-17T03:15:00.0Z
</rdeNotification:reDate>
<rdeNotification:vaDate>
2010-10-17T05:15:00.0Z
</rdeNotification:vaDate>
<rdeNotification:lastFullDate>
2010-10-14
</rdeNotification:lastFullDate>
<rdeReport:report>
<rdeReport:id>20101017001</rdeReport:id>
<rdeReport:version>1</rdeReport:version>
<rdeReport:rydeSpecEscrow>
RFC8909
</rdeReport:rydeSpecEscrow>
<rdeReport:rydeSpecMapping>
RFC9022
</rdeReport:rydeSpecMapping>
<rdeReport:resend>0</rdeReport:resend>
<rdeReport:crDate>2010-10-17T00:15:00.0Z</rdeReport:crDate>
<rdeReport:kind>FULL</rdeReport:kind>
<rdeReport:watermark>2010-10-17T00:00:00Z</rdeReport:watermark>
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
<rdeHeader:header>
<rdeHeader:tld>test</rdeHeader:tld>
<rdeHeader:count
uri="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeDomain-1.0">1</rdeHeader:count>
<rdeHeader:count
uri="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeHost-1.0">3</rdeHeader:count>
<rdeHeader:count
uri="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeContact-1.0">1</rdeHeader:count>
<rdeHeader:count
uri="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeRegistrar-1.0">3</rdeHeader:count>
<rdeHeader:count
uri="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeIDN-1.0">1</rdeHeader:count>
<rdeHeader:count
uri="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeNNDN-1.0">10</rdeHeader:count>
<rdeHeader:count
uri="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeEppParams-1.0">0</rdeHeader:count>
</rdeHeader:header>
</rdeReport:report>
</rdeNotification:notification>
2.3. Monitoring the reporting status
Registries MAY monitor the status of the reports described in
Specification 2 [ICANN-GTLD-RA-20170731] using the following
interfaces that support the HEAD HTTP verb:
2.3.1. Monitoring the status of Data Escrow Reports
Registries MAY monitor the status of Data Escrow Reports using the
following interface:
<base-url>/info/report/registry-escrow-report/<tld>/<date>
Where:
* <tld> MUST be substituted by the TLD being queried. In the
case of an IDN TLD, the A-label (see [RFC5890]) MUST be used.
* <date> MUST be substituted by the day being queried. For
example, 2013-03-02.
Possible results are:
* The interface provides an HTTP/200 status code if a
syntactically valid data escrow report was received for the
queried date.
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
* The interface provides an HTTP/404 status code if a
syntactically valid data escrow report has not been received
for the queried date.
2.3.2. Monitoring the status of Data Escrow Notifications
Registries and Data Escrow Agents MAY monitor the status of Data
Escrow Notifications using the following interface:
<base-url>/info/report/escrow-agent-notification/<tld>/<date>
Where:
* <tld> MUST be substituted by the TLD being queried. In the
case of an IDN TLD, the A-label (see [RFC5890]) MUST be used.
* <date> MUST be substituted by the day being queried. For
example, 2013-03-02.
Possible results are:
* The interface provides an HTTP/200 status code if a
syntactically valid data escrow notification was received for
the queried date.
* The interface provides an HTTP/404 status code if a
syntactically valid data escrow notification has not been
received for the queried date.
3. Interfaces of Specification 3 - Registry Operator Monthly Reporting
Specification 3 of the gTLD Base Registry Agreement
[ICANN-GTLD-RA-20170731] requires Registry Operators to provide a set
of monthly reports per gTLD. Two types of reports are required to be
sent by Registries: Per-Registrar Transactions Report and Registry
Functions Activity Report. This section specifies the interfaces
provided by ICANN to automate the upload of these reports by Registry
Operators.
The cut-off date for the reception of the reports specified in
specification 3 is defined in the gTLD Base Registry Agreement
[ICANN-GTLD-RA-20170731]. Before the cut-off date, the Registry
Operator MAY replace a successfully validated report as many times as
needed.
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
3.1. Per-Registrar Transactions Report
The Per-Registrar Transactions Report is a CSV report encoded in
UTF-8 described in Section 1 of Specification 3 of the gTLD Base
Registry Agreement [ICANN-GTLD-RA-20170731].
To satisfy this requirement, the Registry Operator sends a CSV report
monthly as described in the gTLD Base Registry Agreement
[ICANN-GTLD-RA-20170731], using the PUT HTTP verb in the interface
provided by ICANN at:
<base-url>/report/registrar-transactions/<tld>/<date>
Where:
* <tld> MUST be substituted by the TLD for which the report is
being provided. In the case of an IDN TLD, the A-label (see
[RFC5890]) MUST be used.
* <date> MUST be substituted by the month for which the report is
being provided in the form of YYYY-MM. Where 'YYYY' is the
year, and 'MM' is the two-digit month number. For example,
2013-03.
3.2. Registry Functions Activity Report
The Registry Functions Activity Report is a CSV report encoded in
UTF-8 described in Section 2 of Specification 3 of the gTLD Base
Registry Agreement [ICANN-GTLD-RA-20170731].
To satisfy this requirement, the Registry Operator sends a CSV report
monthly as described in the gTLD Base Registry Agreement
[ICANN-GTLD-RA-20170731], using the PUT HTTP verb in the interface
provided by ICANN at:
<base-url>/report/registry-functions-activity/<tld>/<date>
Where:
* <tld> MUST be substituted by the TLD for which the report is
being provided. In the case of an IDN TLD, the A-label (see
[RFC5890]) MUST be used.
* <date> MUST be substituted by the month for which the report is
being provided in the form of YYYY-MM. Where 'YYYY' is the
year, and 'MM' is the two-digit month number. For example,
2013-03.
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
3.3. Monitoring the reporting status
Registries MAY monitor the status of the reports described in
Specification 3 of the gTLD Base Registry Agreement
[ICANN-GTLD-RA-20170731] using the following interfaces that support
the HEAD HTTP verb:
3.3.1. Monitoring the status of Registry Functions Activity Report
Registries MAY monitor the status of Registry Functions Activity
Report using the following interface:
<base-url>/info/report/registry-functions-activity/<tld>/<date>
Where:
* <tld> MUST be substituted by the TLD being queried. In the
case of an IDN TLD, the A-label (see [RFC5890]) MUST be used.
* <date> MUST be substituted by the month being queried. For
example, 2013-03.
Possible results are:
* The interface provides an HTTP/200 status code if a
syntactically valid registry functions activity report was
received for the queried month.
* The interface provides an HTTP/404 status code if a
syntactically valid registry functions activity report has not
been received for the queried month.
3.3.2. Monitoring the status of the Per-Registrar Transactions Report
Registries MAY monitor the status of Per-Registrar Transactions
Report using the following interface:
<base-url>/info/report/registrar-transactions/<tld>/<date>
Where:
* <tld> MUST be substituted by the TLD being queried. In the
case of an IDN TLD, the A-label (see [RFC5890]) MUST be used.
* <date> MUST be substituted by the month being queried. For
example, 2013-03.
Possible results are:
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
* The interface provides an HTTP/200 status code if a
syntactically valid per-registrar transactions report was
received for the queried month.
* The interface provides an HTTP/404 status code if a
syntactically valid per-registrar transactions report has not
been received for the queried month.
4. Maintenance Windows
Specification 10 of the gTLD Base Registry Agreement
[ICANN-GTLD-RA-20170731] allows Registry Operators to provide notice
to ICANN about plans of maintenance. This section specifies the
interfaces provided by ICANN to programmatically manage maintenance
windows by Registry Operators.
4.1. Creating and updating a maintenance window
To create or update a previously created maintenance window, the
Registry Operator sends a <schedule:schedule> object (see
Section 1.4.7) using the PUT HTTP verb in the interface provided by
ICANN at:
<base-url>/maintenance-window/<tld>/<service>/<scheduleId>
Where:
* <tld> MUST be substituted by the TLD for which the report is
being provided. In the case of an IDN TLD, the A-label (see
[RFC5890]) MUST be used.
* <service> MUST be substituted by a service for which a
maintenance window could be created (e.g., RDDS).
* <scheduleId> MUST be substituted by a Universally Unique
IDentifier version 4 (see [RFC4122]).
4.2. Deleting a maintenance window
To delete a previously created maintenance window, the Registry
Operator uses the DELETE HTTP verb in the interface provided by ICANN
at:
<base-url>/maintenance-window/<tld>/<service>/<scheduleId>
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
4.3. Getting the persisted data for a maintenance window
To get the persisted data for a maintenance window, the Registry
Operator uses the GET HTTP verb in the interface provided by ICANN
at:
<base-url>/maintenance-window/<tld>/<service>/<scheduleId>
The interface provides an HTTP/200 status code and sets the HTTP
header Content-type: text/xml after a successful request, and
includes a <schedule:schedule> object as defined in Section 1.4.7.
Example of a <schedule:schedule> object of a Maintenance Window:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<schedule:schedule xmlns:schedule="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:schedule-1.0"
enabled="true" scheduleId="6257b2b9-1ff7-4159-bc0d-397fec035d38">
<schedule:name>Maintenance window for RDDS semester II-2017
</schedule:name>
<schedule:description>Pre-planned maintenance window for RDDS
</schedule:description>
<schedule:startTime>2010-10-17T00:15:00.0Z</schedule:startTime>
<schedule:endTime>2010-10-17T02:15:00.0Z</schedule:endTime>
<schedule:version>1</schedule:version>
</schedule:schedule>
4.4. Getting a list of maintenance windows
To get the list of all the maintenance windows that have not ended
yet (see Section 4), the Registry Operator uses the GET HTTP verb in
the interface provided by ICANN at:
<base-url>maintenance-window/<tld>/<service>
The interface provides an HTTP/200 status code and sets the HTTP
header Content-type: text/xml after a successful request, and
includes a <schedule:schedules> object as defined in Section 1.4.8.
Example of a <schedule:schedules>:
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<schedule:schedules
xmlns:schedule="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:schedule-1.0">
<schedule:schedule enabled="true"
scheduleId="6257b2b9-1ff7-4159-bc0d-397fec035d38">
<schedule:name>Maintenance window for example</schedule:name>
<schedule:description>Pre-planned maintenance window 1
</schedule:description>
<schedule:startTime>2010-10-17T00:15:00.0Z</schedule:startTime>
<schedule:endTime>2010-10-17T02:15:00.0Z</schedule:endTime>
<schedule:version>1</schedule:version>
</schedule:schedule>
<schedule:schedule enabled="true"
scheduleId="3da01e98-1945-4cc9-9334-bd3ad5b36371">
<schedule:name>Maintenance window for example</schedule:name>
<schedule:description>Pre-planned maintenance window 2
</schedule:description>
<schedule:startTime>2010-10-19T00:15:00.0Z</schedule:startTime>
<schedule:endTime>2010-10-19T02:15:00.0Z</schedule:endTime>
<schedule:version>1</schedule:version>
</schedule:schedule>
</schedule:schedules>
5. Interfaces for the SLAM Probe Node List
The current list of probe nodes used by the SLA Monitoring System may
be retrieved by using the GET HTTP verb in the interface provided by
ICANN at:
<base-url>/slam-probe-nodes/list
The interface provides an HTTP/200 status code and sets the HTTP
header Content-type: text/xml after a successful request, and
includes a <probeNode:probeNodes> object as defined in Section 1.4.9.
Example of the response upon successful retrieval of the SLAM Probe
Node List:
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<probeNode:probeNodes
xmlns:probeNode="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:probeNode-1.0">
<probeNode:probeNode>
<probeNode:city>Mumbai</probeNode:city>
<probeNode:addr ip="v4">192.0.2.1</probeNode:addr>
<probeNode:addr ip="v6">2001:db8:1::1</probeNode:addr>
</probeNode:probeNode>
<probeNode:probeNode>
<probeNode:city>Seoul</probeNode:city>
<probeNode:addr ip="v4">198.51.100.1</probeNode:addr>
</probeNode:probeNode>
<probeNode:updateTime>2020-11-18T02:23:56-08:00
</probeNode:updateTime>
<probeNode:version>1</probeNode:version>
</probeNode:probeNodes>
6. Technical details of the interfaces
This section describes the technical details of the interfaces
described in this document.
6.1. General technical details
This section describes the technical details that apply to all the
interfaces described in this document.
The following HTTP status codes are returned:
o The interface provides an HTTP/401 status code and sets the HTTP
header Content-type: text/plain, if the credentials provided do
not authorize the user to perform the action requested for that
<tld>.
o The interface provides an HTTP/403 status code and sets the HTTP
header Content-type: text/plain, if the user attempts to access a
resource that permission is not granted for, or the connecting IP
address is not authorized for the <tld>.
o The interface provides an HTTP/404 status code if the object
referenced in the URL is not found.
o The interface provides an HTTP/405 status code if the interface
does not support the request method.
o The interface provides an HTTP/500 status code and sets the HTTP
header Content-type: text/plain, if the system is experiencing a
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
general failure. The sending party is responsible for sending the
input again.
o The interface provides an HTTP/501 status code and sets the HTTP
header Content-type: text/plain, if the functionality has not yet
been implemented.
After sending the response, the interfaces close the TCP connection.
The interfaces support HTTP streams only (HTTP multi-part forms are
not supported).
6.2. Specific technical details
This section describes the technical details that apply to the
following interfaces:
o Registry Operator Reporting (see Section 2.1)
o Data Escrow Agent Reporting (see Section 2.2)
o Per-Registrar Transactions Report (see Section 3.1)
o Registry Functions Activity Report (see Section 3.2)
o Creating and updating a maintenance window (see Section 4.1)
o Deleting a maintenance window (see Section 4.2)
The following additional HTTP status codes are returned:
o The interface provides an HTTP/200 status code and sets the HTTP
header Content-type: text/xml, if the interface was able to
receive the input successfully, the client MUST review the
response object (see Section 6.2.1) to verify the result code
after processing the input.
o The interface provides an HTTP/400 status code and sets the HTTP
header Content-type: text/xml, if the input is incorrect or the
syntax of the input is invalid. A response object (see
Section 6.2.1) is included with the input validation failure
details.
Content-type value in the HTTP header:
o The client MUST set "text/xml" in the HTTP header Content-type
when using the interfaces described in Section 2.1, Section 2.2,
Section 4.1, and Section 4.2.
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 23]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
o The client MUST set "text/csv" in the HTTP header Content-type
when using the interfaces described in Section 3.1 and
Section 3.2.
6.2.1. Response Object
After processing the input provided to the interfaces described in
this section, a response object defined in Section 1.4.1 is sent in
the HTTP Entity-body when an HTTP/200 or HTTP/400 status code is sent
by the interface.
An example of a response object upon successful input receipt is
presented below:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: text/xml
Content-Length: 248
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<response
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:iirdea-1.0">
<result code="1000">
<msg>No ERRORs were found and the report has been
accepted by ICANN.</msg>
<description></description>
</result>
</response>
An example of a response object in the event of input error is
presented below:
HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request
Content-Type: text/xml
Content-Length: 279
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<response
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:iirdea-1.0">
<result code="2001">
<msg>The structure of the report is invalid.</msg>
<description>
'XX' could not be parsed as a number (line: 2 column:3)
</description>
</result>
</response>
The following sections provide the IIRDEA Result Codes per interface:
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 24]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
6.2.1.1. Registry Operator Reporting
The following table lists the result codes of the Registry Operator
Reporting interface (see Section 2.1):
+--------+----------------------------------------------------------+
| Result | Message |
| Code | |
+--------+----------------------------------------------------------+
| 1000 | No ERRORs were found, and the report has been accepted |
| | by ICANN. |
| 2001 | The request did not validate against the schema. |
| 2004 | Report for a date in the future. The <crDate> and |
| | <watermark> date should not be in the future. |
| 2005 | Version is not supported. |
| 2006 | The <id> in the <report> element and the <id> in the URL |
| | path do not match. |
| 2007 | Interface is disabled for this TLD. |
| 2008 | The <crDate> and <watermark> date should not be before |
| | the creation date of the TLD in the system. |
| 2202 | The <tld> in the <header> and the TLD in the URL path do |
| | not match. |
| 2205 | Report regarding a differential deposit received when a |
| | full deposit was expected (<watermark>). |
| 2206 | csvDomain and rdeDomain count provided in the <header>. |
| 2209 | Missing required <tld> element in the <header>. |
| 2210 | The value of the "rcdn" attribute in the <count> element |
| | does not match the same or lower level names in the |
| | <tld> in the URL path. |
| 2211 | Multiple count elements with the same "uri", "rcdn", and |
| | "registrarId" attribute values provided in the <header>. |
| 2212 | An invalid NR-LDH label or A-label was found or the |
| | domain name syntax is invalid in the "rcdn" attribute. |
+--------+----------------------------------------------------------+
Data Escrow Reporting Result Codes
6.2.1.2. Data Escrow Agent Reporting
The following table lists the result codes of the Data Escrow Agent
Reporting interface (see Section 2.2):
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 25]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
+--------+----------------------------------------------------------+
| Result | Message |
| Code | |
+--------+----------------------------------------------------------+
| 1000 | No ERRORs were found, and the notification has been |
| | accepted by ICANN. |
| 2001 | The request did not validate against the schema. |
| 2002 | A DVPN notification exists for that date (<repDate>). |
| 2004 | Notification for a date in the future. The <crDate> and |
| | <watermark> and <repDate> date should not be in the |
| | future. |
| 2005 | Version is not supported. |
| 2007 | Interface is disabled for this TLD. |
| 2008 | The <crDate> and <watermark> and <repDate> date should |
| | not be before the creation date of the TLD in the |
| | system. |
| 2201 | The <repDate> and <watermark> in the notification do not |
| | match. |
| 2202 | The <tld> in the <header> and the TLD in the URL path do |
| | not match. |
| 2203 | A Deposit Verification Pass Notice (DVPN) notification |
| | was received, but the Domain Name count is missing in |
| | the <header>. |
| 2204 | The notification for the report "id" already exists. |
| 2205 | Notification regarding a differential deposit received |
| | when a full deposit was expected (<repDate>). |
| 2206 | csvDomain and rdeDomain count provided in the <header>. |
| 2207 | A DVPN or DVFN was received, but the <report> element is |
| | missing in the notification. |
| 2208 | A DRFN was received, but an <report> element exists in |
| | the notification. |
| 2209 | Missing required <tld> element in the <header>. |
| 2210 | The value of the "rcdn" attribute in the <count> element |
| | does not match the same or lower level names in the |
| | <tld> in the URL path. |
| 2211 | Multiple count elements with the same "uri", "rcdn", and |
| | "registrarId" attribute values provided in the <header>. |
| 2212 | An invalid NR-LDH label or A-label was found or the |
| | domain name syntax is invalid in the "rcdn" attribute. |
+--------+----------------------------------------------------------+
Data Escrow Reporting Result Codes
6.2.1.3. Per-Registrar Transactions Report
The following table lists the result codes of the Per-Registrar
Transactions Report interface (see Section 3.1):
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 26]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
+----------+--------------------------------------------------------+
| Result | Message |
| Code | |
+----------+--------------------------------------------------------+
| 1000 | No ERRORs were found, and the report has been accepted |
| | by ICANN. |
| 2001 | The structure of the report is invalid. |
| 2002 | A report for that month already exists, the cut-off |
| | date already passed. |
| 2003 | Negative numeric value present in the report. |
| 2004 | Report for a month in the future. |
| 2007 | Interface is disabled for this TLD. |
| 2008 | Reported month before the creation date of the TLD in |
| | the system. |
| 2101 | Incorrect totals present in the report. |
| 2102 | A non-ICANN-accredited registrar is present in the |
| | report. |
| 2103 | Values found in the second field of the totals line. |
| 2105 | The report is not encoded in UTF-8. Note: reports |
| | encoded in US-ASCII are accepted. |
+----------+--------------------------------------------------------+
Per-Registrar Transactions Report Result Codes
6.2.1.4. Registry Functions Activity Report
The following table lists the result codes of the Registry Functions
Activity Report interface (see Section 3.2):
+----------+--------------------------------------------------------+
| Result | Message |
| Code | |
+----------+--------------------------------------------------------+
| 1000 | No ERRORs were found, and the report has been accepted |
| | by ICANN. |
| 2001 | The structure of the report is invalid. |
| 2002 | A report for that month already exists, the cut-off |
| | date already passed. |
| 2003 | Negative numeric value present in the report. |
| 2004 | Report for a month in the future. |
| 2007 | Interface is disabled for this TLD. |
| 2008 | Reported month before the creation date of the TLD in |
| | the system. |
| 2105 | The report is not encoded in UTF-8. Note: reports |
| | encoded in US-ASCII are accepted. |
+----------+--------------------------------------------------------+
Registry Functions Activity Report Result Codes
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 27]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
6.2.1.5. Maintenance Window Management
The following table lists the result codes of the Maintenance Window
Management interface (see Section 4):
+--------+-----+--------+-----+-------------------------------------+
| Result | PUT | DELETE | GET | Message |
| Code | | | | |
+--------+-----+--------+-----+-------------------------------------+
| 1000 | * | * | | No ERRORs were found, and the |
| | | | | report has been accepted by ICANN. |
| 2001 | * | | | The request did not validate |
| | | | | against the schema. |
| 2005 | * | | | Version is not supported. |
| 2006 | * | | | The scheduleId in the schedule |
| | | | | object and the scheduleId in the |
| | | | | URL PATH do not match. |
| 2007 | * | * | * | Interface is disabled for this TLD. |
| 2401 | * | * | * | The syntax of the UUID in the PATH |
| | | | | is incorrect. |
| 2402 | * | | | The maintenance window start date |
| | | | | and time is not 24 hours ahead of |
| | | | | the current date and time. |
| 2403 | * | | | The period specified by start and |
| | | | | end date and time is greater than |
| | | | | the monthly SLR for the service. |
| 2404 | * | | | The period specified in the |
| | | | | maintenance window collides with a |
| | | | | previously scheduled maintenance |
| | | | | window for the service. |
| 2405 | | * | | The maintenance window that you are |
| | | | | trying to delete already started. |
| 2406 | * | | | The endTime is in the past, before |
| | | | | or equal to the startTime. |
| 2407 | * | | | The maintenance window that you are |
| | | | | trying to update already ended, |
| | | | | updates are not allowed. |
| 2408 | * | | | The maintenance window that you are |
| | | | | trying to update already started, |
| | | | | only enabled and endTime fields can |
| | | | | be modified. |
+--------+-----+--------+-----+-------------------------------------+
Maintenance Window Management Result Codes
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 28]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
7. Formal Syntax
The schema of the IIRDEA Result, Report, Notification, RRI Reporting,
Notifications, and Reports objects described in Section 1.4 are
presented here.
The <CODE BEGINS> and <CODE ENDS> tags are not part of the schema;
they are used to note the beginning and ending of the schema for URI
registration purposes.
7.1. RRI IIRDEA Result Schema
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 29]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
<CODE BEGINS>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<schema targetNamespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:iirdea-1.0"
xmlns:iirdea="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:iirdea-1.0"
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
elementFormDefault="qualified">
<annotation>
<documentation>
ICANN interfaces for registries and data escrow agents
</documentation>
</annotation>
<element name="response" type="iirdea:responseType"/>
<element name="result" type="iirdea:resultType"/>
<complexType name="responseType">
<sequence>
<element ref="iirdea:result" />
</sequence>
</complexType>
<complexType name="resultType">
<sequence>
<element name="msg" type="token"/>
<element name="description" type="string"
minOccurs="0"/>
</sequence>
<attribute name="code" type="iirdea:codeType"
use="required"/>
<attribute name="domainCount" type="unsignedInt"/>
</complexType>
<simpleType name="codeType">
<restriction base="unsignedShort">
<minInclusive value="1000"/>
<maxInclusive value="9999"/>
</restriction>
</simpleType>
</schema>
<CODE ENDS>
7.2. RRI Report Object
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 30]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
<CODE BEGINS>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<schema targetNamespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeReport-1.0"
xmlns:rdeReport="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeReport-1.0"
xmlns:rdeHeader="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeHeader-1.0"
xmlns:rde="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rde-1.0"
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
elementFormDefault="qualified">
<import namespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rde-1.0" />
<import namespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeHeader-1.0" />
<annotation>
<documentation>
Data Escrow Report schema
</documentation>
</annotation>
<element name="report" type="rdeReport:reportType"/>
<complexType name="reportType">
<sequence>
<element name="id" type="rde:depositIdType"/>
<element name="version" type="unsignedShort"/>
<element name="rydeSpecEscrow" type="token"/>
<element name="rydeSpecMapping" type="token" minOccurs="0"/>
<element name="resend" type="unsignedShort"/>
<element name="crDate" type="dateTime"/>
<element name="kind" type="rde:depositTypeType"/>
<element name="watermark" type="dateTime"/>
<element ref="rdeHeader:header"/>
</sequence>
</complexType>
</schema>
<CODE ENDS>
7.3. RRI Notification Object
<CODE BEGINS>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<schema targetNamespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeNotification-1.0"
xmlns:rdeNotification="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeNotification-1.0"
xmlns:rdeReport="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeReport-1.0"
xmlns:iirdea="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:iirdea-1.0"
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
elementFormDefault="qualified">
<import namespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeReport-1.0"/>
<import namespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:iirdea-1.0"/>
<annotation>
<documentation>
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 31]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
Data Escrow Notification schema
</documentation>
</annotation>
<element name="notification"
type="rdeNotification:notificationType"/>
<complexType name="notificationType">
<sequence>
<element name="deaName" type="rdeNotification:nameType"/>
<element name="version" type="unsignedShort"/>
<element name="repDate" type="date"/>
<element name="status" type="rdeNotification:statusType"/>
<element name="results" type="rdeNotification:resultsType"
minOccurs="0" />
<element name="reDate" type="dateTime" minOccurs="0"/>
<element name="vaDate" type="dateTime" minOccurs="0"/>
<element name="lastFullDate" type="date" minOccurs="0"/>
<element ref="rdeReport:report" minOccurs="0"/>
</sequence>
</complexType>
<simpleType name="nameType">
<restriction base="normalizedString">
<minLength value="1" />
<maxLength value="255" />
</restriction>
</simpleType>
<complexType name="resultsType">
<sequence>
<element ref="iirdea:result" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
</sequence>
</complexType>
<simpleType name="statusType">
<restriction base="token">
<enumeration value="DVPN"/>
<enumeration value="DVFN"/>
<enumeration value="DRFN"/>
</restriction>
</simpleType>
</schema>
<CODE ENDS>
7.4. RRI Reporting Summary Object
<CODE BEGINS>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<schema targetNamespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rriReporting-1.0"
xmlns:rriReporting="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rriReporting-1.0"
xmlns:rdeHeader="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeHeader-1.0"
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 32]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
elementFormDefault="qualified">
<import namespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeHeader-1.0" />
<element name="summary" type="rriReporting:summaryType"/>
<complexType name="summaryType">
<sequence>
<group ref="rdeHeader:repositoryTypeGroup"/>
<element name="creationDate" type="dateTime" />
<element name="depositSchedule"
type="rriReporting:depositScheduleType" />
<element name="lastFullDate" type="date" minOccurs="0"/>
<element name="statusReports"
type="rriReporting:statusReportsType" />
<element name="timestamp" type="dateTime" />
</sequence>
</complexType>
<simpleType name="depositScheduleType">
<restriction base="token">
<enumeration value="None" />
<enumeration value="Weekly" />
<enumeration value="Daily" />
</restriction>
</simpleType>
<complexType name="statusReportsType">
<sequence>
<element name="statusReport"
type="rriReporting:statusReportType" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
</sequence>
</complexType>
<complexType name="statusReportType">
<sequence>
<element name="type" type="rriReporting:statusReportTypeType" />
<element name="enabled" type="boolean" />
<element name="status" type="rriReporting:statusType" />
<element name="issues" type="rriReporting:issuesType"
minOccurs="0" />
</sequence>
</complexType>
<simpleType name="statusReportTypeType">
<restriction base="token">
<enumeration value="DEA_Notification" />
<enumeration value="Registrar_Escrow_Report" />
<enumeration value="Registry_Escrow_Report" />
<enumeration value="PPSP_Escrow_Report" />
<enumeration value="Registry_Functions_Activity_Report" />
<enumeration value="Registry_Per_Registrar_Transactions_Report" />
<enumeration value="PPSP_Per_Registrar_Activity_Report" />
</restriction>
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 33]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
</simpleType>
<simpleType name="statusType">
<restriction base="token">
<enumeration value="ok" />
<enumeration value="unsatisfactory" />
</restriction>
</simpleType>
<complexType name="issuesType">
<sequence>
<element name="issue" type="rriReporting:issueType"
maxOccurs="unbounded" />
</sequence>
</complexType>
<complexType name="issueType">
<attribute name="date" type="rriReporting:issueDateType"
use="required" />
<attribute name="description" type="rriReporting:descriptionType"
use="required" />
</complexType>
<simpleType name="issueDateType">
<restriction base="token">
<pattern
value="\d{4}-(0[1-9]|1[012])(-(0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01]))?" />
</restriction>
</simpleType>
<simpleType name="descriptionType">
<restriction base="token">
<enumeration value="Missing_Deposit_Full" />
<enumeration value="Missing_Deposit_Diff" />
<enumeration value="Invalid_Deposit_Full" />
<enumeration value="Invalid_Deposit_Diff" />
<enumeration value="No_Report_Received" />
</restriction>
</simpleType>
</schema>
<CODE ENDS>
7.5. RRI Notifications Object
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 34]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
<CODE BEGINS>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<schema targetNamespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeNotifications-1.0"
xmlns:rdeNotifications="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeNotifications-1.0"
xmlns:rdeNotification="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeNotification-1.0"
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
elementFormDefault="qualified">
<import namespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeNotification-1.0" />
<element name="notifications"
type="rdeNotifications:notificationsType"/>
<complexType name="notificationsType">
<sequence>
<element name="receivedNotification" maxOccurs="unbounded"
minOccurs="0">
<complexType>
<sequence>
<element name="received" type="dateTime" />
<element ref="rdeNotification:notification" />
</sequence>
</complexType>
</element>
</sequence>
</complexType>
</schema>
<CODE ENDS>
7.6. RRI Reports Object
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 35]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
<CODE BEGINS>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<schema targetNamespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeReports-1.0"
xmlns:rdeReport="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeReport-1.0"
xmlns:rdeReports="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeReports-1.0"
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
elementFormDefault="qualified">
<import namespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeReport-1.0" />
<element name="reports" type="rdeReports:reportsType"/>
<complexType name="reportsType">
<sequence>
<element name="receivedReport" maxOccurs="unbounded"
minOccurs="0">
<complexType>
<sequence>
<element name="received" type="dateTime" />
<element ref="rdeReport:report" />
</sequence>
</complexType>
</element>
</sequence>
</complexType>
</schema>
<CODE ENDS>
7.7. Maintenance Window
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 36]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
<CODE BEGINS>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<schema targetNamespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:schedule-1.0"
xmlns:schedule="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:schedule-1.0"
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
elementFormDefault="qualified">
<element name="schedule" type="schedule:scheduleType"/>
<element name="schedules" type="schedule:schedulesType"/>
<complexType name="scheduleType">
<sequence>
<element name="name" type="schedule:nameType"/>
<element name="description" type="schedule:descriptionType"/>
<element name="startTime" type="dateTime"/>
<element name="endTime" type="dateTime"/>
<element name="version" type="unsignedShort"/>
</sequence>
<attribute name="enabled" type="boolean"
use="required"/>
<attribute name="scheduleId" type="schedule:uuidType"/>
</complexType>
<complexType name="schedulesType">
<sequence>
<element name="schedule" type="schedule:scheduleType"
maxOccurs="unbounded" minOccurs="0"/>
</sequence>
</complexType>
<simpleType name="uuidType">
<restriction base="token">
<pattern
value="[a-f0-9]{8}-[a-f0-9]{4}-[a-f0-9]{4}-[a-f0-9]{4}-[a-f0-9]{12}">
</pattern>
</restriction>
</simpleType>
<simpleType name="nameType">
<restriction base="token">
<minLength value="1"/>
</restriction>
</simpleType>
<simpleType name="descriptionType">
<restriction base="token">
<minLength value="1"/>
</restriction>
</simpleType>
</schema>
<CODE ENDS>
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 37]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
7.8. SLAM Probe Node List
<CODE BEGINS>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<schema targetNamespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:probeNode-1.0"
xmlns:probeNode="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:probeNode-1.0"
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
elementFormDefault="qualified">
<element name="probeNode" type="probeNode:probeNodeType" />
<element name="probeNodes" type="probeNode:probeNodesType" />
<complexType name="probeNodeType">
<sequence>
<element name="city" type="token" />
<element name="addr" type="probeNode:addrType"
maxOccurs="unbounded" />
</sequence>
</complexType>
<complexType name="probeNodesType">
<sequence>
<element name="probeNode" type="probeNode:probeNodeType"
maxOccurs="unbounded" />
<element name="updateTime" type="dateTime" />
<element name="version" type="unsignedShort" />
</sequence>
</complexType>
<complexType name="addrType">
<simpleContent>
<extension base="probeNode:addrStringType">
<attribute name="ip" type="probeNode:ipType"
use="required" />
</extension>
</simpleContent>
</complexType>
<simpleType name="addrStringType">
<restriction base="token">
<minLength value="3" />
<maxLength value="45" />
</restriction>
</simpleType>
<simpleType name="ipType">
<restriction base="token">
<enumeration value="v4" />
<enumeration value="v6" />
</restriction>
</simpleType>
</schema>
<CODE ENDS>
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 38]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
8. Acknowledgements
Special suggestions that have been incorporated into this document
were provided by David Kipling, James Gould, Gregory Zaltsman, Brett
Carr, and Harel Efraim.
9. Change History
[[RFC Editor: Please remove this section.]]
9.1. Version 00
Initial version.
9.2. Version 01
o <rdeReport:report> and <rdeNotification:notification> moved from
escrow drafts to this draft
o Added <crDate> to <rdeReport:report>
o <reDate> element of <rdeReport:report> is now OPTIONAL
o Added <deaName> element to <rdeNotification:notification>
o <rydeSpecEscrow> and <rydeSpecMapping> added to the draft
o Several report elements are OPTIONAL to support async interfaces
between Registry Operators and Data Escrow Agents
o Added <TLD> and <id> to registry-escrow-report interface in order
to make the interface idempotent and support async RyO-DEA
interfaces
o Added <TLD> to escrow-agent-notification interface
o The escrow-agent-notification uses POST and not PUT, this has been
fixed
o Several clarifications
9.3. Version 02
o Added and updated several result codes.
o Added <version> element.
o Added Content-type definition.
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 39]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
9.4. Version 03
o Added several result codes.
o unsignedShort is now used for result code in iirdea schema.
o Enumeration was removed from the iirdea schema.
9.5. Version 04
o Added result codes: 2207 and 2208.
o Removed result codes: 2203.
o Added clarification regarding the support of HTTP streams.
9.6. Version 05
o Added result codes: 2007 and 2008.
9.7. Version 06
o Added clarification of error code HTTP/403 in Section 6.
9.8. Version 07
o Added Section 5: "Monitoring compliance with the New gTLD Base
Agreement".
9.9. Version 08
o Reorganized specification structure to allow easier references
from new specifications expanding functionality in the ICANN
Registry Interfaces.
o Added Section 1.4 to document object definitions, previously
defined in other sections.
o Added <rriReporting>, <notifications>, and <reports> object
descriptions to Section 1.4, and schema definitions to Section 7.
o Renamed Section 5 title as "Monitoring the reporting status".
o Updated element <rydeSpecMapping> as OPTIONAL in the <rdeReport>
schema.
o Added OPTIONAL attribute "domainCount" to the <iirdea:result>
element.
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 40]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
o Added OPTIONAL element <results> to the <rdeNotification> schema.
o Added result codes: 2105, 2209, 2210 and 2211.
o Added "gTLD Base Registry Agreement" references.
o Added clarifications to Section 6.
9.10. Version 09
o Standardized XSD schema validation error message for notifications
and reports.
o Element <lastFullDate> made optional in the <rriReporting> schema.
o Separated example RRI interface responses for successful and
unsuccessful input.
9.11. Version 10
1. Ping update.
9.12. Version 11
1. Ping update.
9.13. Version 12
1. Ping update.
9.14. Version 13
1. IANA Considerations section added.
2. Implementation section added.
3. Internationalization Considerations status section added.
4. Security section added.
5. Editorial updates.
9.15. Version 14
1. Ping update.
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 41]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
9.16. Version 15
1. Added description and technical details for the interfaces for
management of maintenance windows and list of probe nodes.
2. I-D was restructured to make it easier to read.
3. Editorial updates.
9.17. Version 16
1. Added interface description for supporting maintenance window
objects and retrieving the IP addresses of the probe nodes used
in the SLA Monitoring System (SLAM).
2. I-D was restructured to make it easier to read.
3. Editorial updates.
9.18. Version 17
1. Ping update.
10. Internationalization Considerations
The interfaces described in this document use XML, which provides
native support for encoding information using the Unicode character
set and its more compact representations including UTF-8. Conformant
XML processors recognize both UTF-8 and UTF-16. Though XML includes
provisions to identify and use other character encodings through use
of an "encoding" attribute in an <?xml?> declaration, use of UTF-8 is
RECOMMENDED.
11. IANA Considerations
This document uses URNs to describe XML namespaces and XML schemas
conforming to a registry mechanism described in [RFC3688]. Six URI
assignments have been registered by the IANA.
Registration request for the RRI IIRDEA Result namespace:
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:iirdea-1.0
Registrant Contact: ICANN <tech-services@icann.org>
Note to RFC Editor: Please remove the email address from the RFC
after IANA records it.
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 42]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
XML: None. Namespace URIs do not represent an XML specification.
Registration request for the RRI IIRDEA Result XML schema:
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:iirdea-1.0
Registrant Contact: ICANN <tech-services@icann.org>
Note to RFC Editor: Please remove the email address from the RFC
after IANA records it.
See section Section 7.1 of this document.
Registration request for the RRI Report namespace:
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeReport-1.0
Registrant Contact: ICANN <tech-services@icann.org>
Note to RFC Editor: Please remove the email address from the RFC
after IANA records it.
XML: None. Namespace URIs do not represent an XML specification.
Registration request for the RRI Report schema:
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeReport-1.0
Registrant Contact: ICANN <tech-services@icann.org>
Note to RFC Editor: Please remove the email address from the RFC
after IANA records it.
See section Section 7.2 of this document.
Registration request for the RRI Notification namespace:
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeNotification-1.0
Registrant Contact: ICANN <tech-services@icann.org>
Note to RFC Editor: Please remove the email address from the RFC
after IANA records it.
XML: None. Namespace URIs do not represent an XML specification.
Registration request for the RRI Notification XML schema:
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 43]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeNotification-1.0
Registrant Contact: ICANN <tech-services@icann.org>
Note to RFC Editor: Please remove the email address from the RFC
after IANA records it.
See section Section 7.3 of this document.
Registration request for the RRI Reporting Summary namespace:
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rriReporting-1.0
Registrant Contact: ICANN <tech-services@icann.org>
Note to RFC Editor: Please remove the email address from the RFC
after IANA records it.
XML: None. Namespace URIs do not represent an XML specification.
Registration request for the RRI Reporting Summary XML schema:
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rriReporting-1.0
Registrant Contact: ICANN <tech-services@icann.org>
Note to RFC Editor: Please remove the email address from the RFC
after IANA records it.
See section Section 7.4 of this document.
Registration request for the RRI Notifications namespace:
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeNotifications-1.0
Registrant Contact: ICANN <tech-services@icann.org>
Note to RFC Editor: Please remove the email address from the RFC
after IANA records it.
XML: None. Namespace URIs do not represent an XML specification.
Registration request for the RRI Notifications XML schema:
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeNotifications-1.0
Registrant Contact: ICANN <tech-services@icann.org>
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 44]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
Note to RFC Editor: Please remove the email address from the RFC
after IANA records it.
See section Section 7.5 of this document.
Registration request for the RRI Reports namespace:
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeReports-1.0
Registrant Contact: ICANN <tech-services@icann.org>
Note to RFC Editor: Please remove the email address from the RFC
after IANA records it.
XML: None. Namespace URIs do not represent an XML specification.
Registration request for the RRI Reports XML schema:
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeReports-1.0
Registrant Contact: ICANN <tech-services@icann.org>
Note to RFC Editor: Please remove the email address from the RFC
after IANA records it.
See section Section 7.6 of this document.
Registration request for the Maintenance Window namespace:
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:schedule-1.0
Registrant Contact: ICANN <tech-services@icann.org>
Note to RFC Editor: Please remove the email address from the RFC
after IANA records it.
XML: None. Namespace URIs do not represent an XML specification.
Registration request for the Maintenance Window XML schema:
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:schedule-1.0
Registrant Contact: ICANN <tech-services@icann.org>
Note to RFC Editor: Please remove the email address from the RFC
after IANA records it.
See section Section 7.7 of this document.
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 45]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
Registration request for the SLAM Probe Node List namespace:
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:probeNode-1.0
Registrant Contact: ICANN <tech-services@icann.org>
Note to RFC Editor: Please remove the email address from the RFC
after IANA records it.
XML: None. Namespace URIs do not represent an XML specification.
Registration request for the SLAM Probe Node List XML schema:
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:probeNode-1.0
Registrant Contact: ICANN <tech-services@icann.org>
Note to RFC Editor: Please remove the email address from the RFC
after IANA records it.
See section Section 7.8 of this document.
12. Implementation Status
Note to RFC Editor: Please remove this section and the reference to
RFC 7942 [RFC7942] before publication.
This section records the status of known implementations of the
protocol defined by this specification at the time of posting of this
Internet-Draft, and is based on a proposal described in RFC 7942
[RFC7942]. The description of implementations in this section is
intended to assist the IETF in its decision processes in progressing
drafts to RFCs. Please note that the listing of any individual
implementation here does not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Furthermore, no effort has been spent to verify the information
presented here that was supplied by IETF contributors. This is not
intended as, and must not be construed to be, a catalog of available
implementations or their features. Readers are advised to note that
other implementations may exist.
According to RFC 7942 [RFC7942], "this will allow reviewers and
working groups to assign due consideration to documents that have the
benefit of running code, which may serve as evidence of valuable
experimentation and feedback that have made the implemented protocols
more mature. It is up to the individual working groups to use this
information as they see fit".
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 46]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
12.1. Implementation in the gTLD space
Organization: ICANN
Name: ICANN Registry Agreement
Description: the ICANN Base Registry Agreement requires Registries,
Data Escrow Agents, and ICANN to implement this specification. ICANN
receives daily notifications from Data Escrow Agents and Registries
using this specification.
Level of maturity: production.
Coverage: all aspects of this specification are implemented.
Version compatibility: versions 00 - 09 are known to be implemented.
Contact: gustavo.lozano@icann.org
URL: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/registries/registries-
agreements-en
13. Security Considerations
The interfaces described in this document MUST be provided using
HTTPS. The recommendations in [RFC7525] MUST be implemented.
14. References
14.1. Normative References
[ICANN-GTLD-RA-20170731]
ICANN, "Base Registry Agreement 2017-07-31", July 2017,
<https://www.icann.org/en/registry-agreements/base-
agreement>.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC3339] Klyne, G. and C. Newman, "Date and Time on the Internet:
Timestamps", RFC 3339, DOI 10.17487/RFC3339, July 2002,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3339>.
[RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688>.
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 47]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
[RFC4122] Leach, P., Mealling, M., and R. Salz, "A Universally
Unique IDentifier (UUID) URN Namespace", RFC 4122,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4122, July 2005,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4122>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
[RFC8909] Lozano, G., "Registry Data Escrow Specification",
RFC 8909, DOI 10.17487/RFC8909, November 2020,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8909>.
[RFC9022] Lozano, G., Gould, J., and C. Thippeswamy, "Domain Name
Registration Data (DNRD) Objects Mapping", RFC 9022,
DOI 10.17487/RFC9022, May 2021,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9022>.
[W3C.REC-xml-20081126]
Bray, T., Paoli, J., Sperberg-McQueen, C., Maler, E., and
F. Yergeau, "Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fifth
Edition) REC-xml-20081126", November 2008,
<https://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126/>.
[W3C.REC-xmlschema-1-20041028]
Thompson, H., Beech, D., Maloney, M., and N. Mendelsohn,
"XML Schema Part 1: Structures Second Edition REC-
xmlschema-1-20041028", October 2004,
<https://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-1-20041028/>.
[W3C.REC-xmlschema-2-20041028]
Biron, P. and A. Malhotra, "XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes
Second Edition REC-xmlschema-2-20041028", October 2004,
<https://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-2-20041028/>.
14.2. Informative References
[RFC5890] Klensin, J., "Internationalized Domain Names for
Applications (IDNA): Definitions and Document Framework",
RFC 5890, DOI 10.17487/RFC5890, August 2010,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5890>.
[RFC7525] Sheffer, Y., Holz, R., and P. Saint-Andre,
"Recommendations for Secure Use of Transport Layer
Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security
(DTLS)", BCP 195, RFC 7525, DOI 10.17487/RFC7525, May
2015, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7525>.
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 48]
Internet-Draft ICANN Registry Interfaces Mar 2022
[RFC7942] Sheffer, Y. and A. Farrel, "Improving Awareness of Running
Code: The Implementation Status Section", BCP 205,
RFC 7942, DOI 10.17487/RFC7942, July 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7942>.
Authors' Addresses
Gustavo Lozano
ICANN
12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
Los Angeles 90292
US
Phone: +1.3103015800
Email: gustavo.lozano@icann.org
Eduardo Alvarez
ICANN
12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
Los Angeles 90292
US
Phone: +1.3103015800
Email: eduardo.alvarez@icann.org
Lozano & Alvarez Expires September 21, 2022 [Page 49]