Synchronous Optical Network/Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SONET/SDH) Circuit Emulation Service over MPLS (CEM) Encapsulation
draft-malis-sonet-ces-mpls-09
Yes
(Mark Townsley)
No Objection
(Chris Newman)
(Dan Romascanu)
(David Ward)
(Jari Arkko)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Ron Bonica)
(Ross Callon)
(Tim Polk)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 09 and is now closed.
Mark Townsley Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Chris Newman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
David Ward Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ross Callon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2007-10-30)
Unknown
From the Gen-ART Review by Suresh Krishnan. Section 5.4.2 says: > > As discussed in section 6.2, a CEM de-packetizer MAY or MAY NOT > support re-ordering of mis-ordered packets. " > The term MAY NOT is not defined in RFC 2119. The use here is confusing. Section 6.2 does not contain any such discussion either. I recommend a corrected reference and "MAY".
Tim Polk Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown