Enabling Transparency for the PPP over SONET/SDH Mapping
draft-manchester-pppext-transper-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | James Manchester , Subrahmanyam Dravida , Jon Anderson , Bharat Tarachand Doshi | ||
| Last updated | 1997-11-26 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Recent Internet Draft submissions and discussion on the PPP Extensions Working Group email list have highlighted a transparency deficiency with the PPP over SONET/SDH mapping described in IETF RFC 1619. This ID proposes that a 1+x**43 scrambler be used to overcome the transparency deficiency of IETF RFC 1619.
Authors
James Manchester
Subrahmanyam Dravida
Jon Anderson
Bharat Tarachand Doshi
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)