Mythbustering Peer-to-peer Traffic Localization
draft-marocco-p2prg-mythbustering-01
| Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Enrico Marocco , Antonio Fusco , Ivica Rimac , Vijay K. Gurbani | ||
| Last updated | 2009-08-20 (Latest revision 2009-07-11) | ||
| Replaced by | draft-irtf-p2prg-mythbustering | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-irtf-p2prg-mythbustering | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Peer-to-peer traffic optimization techniques that aim at improving locality in the peer selection process have attracted great interest in the research community and have been subject of much discussion. Some of this discussion has produced controversial myths, some rooted in reality while others remain unfounded. This document evaluates the most prominent myths attributed to P2P optimization techniques by referencing the most relevant study (or studies) that have addressed facts pertaining to the myth. Using these studies, we hope to either confirm or refute each specific myth.
Authors
Enrico Marocco
Antonio Fusco
Ivica Rimac
Vijay K. Gurbani
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)