Route Distinguisher Zero Value Usage
draft-martini-l3vpn-rd-zero-00
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Luca Martini , Keyur Patel | ||
| Last updated | 2006-10-10 | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
plain text
htmlized
pdfized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of
the expired Internet-Draft can be found at:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-martini-l3vpn-rd-zero-00.txt
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-martini-l3vpn-rd-zero-00.txt
Abstract
The behaviour that must be followed when an route distinguisher (RD) of value zero is received is not clearly defined in rfc4364. This document clarifies the use of an RD with a value of zero in the context defined in rfc 4364.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)