Message Size Overhead of CoAP Security Protocols
draft-mattsson-core-security-overhead-00

The information below is for an old version of the document
Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (individual)
Last updated 2017-09-14 (latest revision 2017-03-13)
Replaced by draft-mattsson-lwig-security-protocol-comparison
Stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Expired & archived
plain text pdf html bibtex
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state Expired
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-mattsson-core-security-overhead-00.txt

Abstract

This document analyzes and compares per-packet message size overheads when using different security protocols to secure CoAP. The analyzed security protocols are DTLS 1.2, DTLS 1.3, TLS 1.2, TLS 1.3, and OSCOAP. DTLS and TLS are analyzed with and without compression. DTLS are analyzed with two different alternatives for header compression.

Authors

John Mattsson (john.mattsson@ericsson.com)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)