Extension Header Use Cases
draft-mcbride-v6ops-eh-use-cases-01
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Mike McBride , Nalini Elkins , Nick Buraglio , Xuesong Geng , michael ackermann | ||
| Last updated | 2024-08-29 (Latest revision 2024-02-26) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document outlines IPv6 extension header use cases including those intended to be deployed in limited domains and those intended for the global Internet. We specify use cases are deployed today and those which may be of use in the future. The hope is that through understanding these various extension header use cases, we can then better understand how best to improve upon extension header deployments including any limits on their use.
Authors
Mike McBride
Nalini Elkins
Nick Buraglio
Xuesong Geng
michael ackermann
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)