Experience with the BGP-4 Protocol
draft-mcpherson-bgp4-expereince-00

Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (individual)
Authors Danny McPherson  , Keyur Patel 
Last updated 2003-04-24
Stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Expired & archived
pdf htmlized (tools) htmlized bibtex
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state Expired
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-mcpherson-bgp4-expereince-00.txt

Abstract

The purpose of this memo is to document how the requirements for advancing a routing protocol from Draft Standard to full Standard have been satisfied by Border Gateway Protocol version 4 (BGP-4). This report satisfies the requirement for 'the second report', as described in Section 6.0 of RFC 1264. In order to fulfill the requirement, this report augments RFC 1773 and describes additional knowledge and understanding gained in the time between when the protocol was made a Draft Standard and when it was submitted for Standard.

Authors

Danny McPherson (danny@arbor.net)
Keyur Patel (keyupate@cisco.com)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)