Registry Transaction Report
draft-mcpherson-sattler-ry-transaction-report-02

Document Type Active Internet-Draft (individual)
Last updated 2018-12-03
Stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats plain text pdf html bibtex
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state I-D Exists
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)
Internet Engineering Task Force                             N. McPherson
Internet-Draft                                              1&1 IONOS SE
Intended status: Best Current Practice                T. Sattler, Editor
Expires: June 2, 2019                                   December 3, 2018

                       Registry Transaction Report
            draft-mcpherson-sattler-ry-transaction-report-02

Abstract

   This document describes the content of a transaction report based on
   the registry report structure and delivered by the registry reporting
   repository.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress".

   This Internet-Draft will expire on June 2, 2019.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

McPherson & Sattler         Expires June 2, 2019                [Page 1]
Internet-Draft          Registry Transaction Report        December 2018

Table of Contents
   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  Terminology and Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
     2.1.  Internationalized Domain Names  . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     2.2.  Dates and Times . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     2.3.  Character Encoding  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     2.4.  Currency  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   3.  Report Headings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   4.  Transaction Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   5.  Transaction Periods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   6.  Transaction Fees  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     6.1.  Deviating Fees  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   7.  Registrar ID  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   8.  Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     8.1.  Single TLD File Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     8.2.  Multiple TLDs File Example  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   9.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   10. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   11. Implementation Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   12. References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
     12.1.  Normative References   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
     12.2.  Informative References   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
   Appendix A.  Change History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
     A.1.  Change from 00 to 01  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
     A.2.  Change from 01 to 02  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
   Appendix B.  Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8

1.  Introduction

   Modern top-level domain registries provide a number of detailed
   reports and documents that their registrars require on a daily,
   weekly and monthly basis. These most commonly include transaction
   reports, as well as lists containing currently unavailable domains
   and current premium domains. These reports are critical for
   registrars' businesses and play an important role in accounting and
   operations processes as well as in sales and marketing activities.
   In the current set-up registrars must download these reports from
   each registry's intranet in a different manner according to each
   registry's own document management set up.
   
   This document describes the content of a transaction report based on
   the [I-D.mcpherson-sattler-registry-report-structure] and delivered
   by the [I-D.mcpherson-sattler-registry-reporting-repo].

2.  Terminology and Definitions

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
Show full document text