MPLS-TP recovery control plane analysis
draft-mcwalter-mpls-tp-recovery-cp-analysis-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Andrew Rhodes , Nic Neate , David McWalter | ||
| Last updated | 2009-07-01 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Segment recovery function can be signaled using the GMPLS Segment Recovery protocol, or by using LSP Hierarchy with End-to-End Recovery. This draft contrasts the two techniques, with particular attention to differences in control plane function and administrative options, and with regard to requirements for the MPLS-TP control plane. This draft discusses existing protocols. It proposes nothing new.
Authors
Andrew Rhodes
Nic Neate
David McWalter
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)