MVPS Terrestrial Mobile and Vehicular Profile: Coherence Monitoring under Cellular Handover and Radio-Access Scheduling
draft-melegassi-ippm-mvps-terrestrial-mobile-00
This document is an Internet-Draft (I-D).
Anyone may submit an I-D to the IETF.
This I-D is not endorsed by the IETF and has no formal standing in the
IETF standards process.
| Document | Type | Active Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Leonardo Melegassi Costa | ||
| Last updated | 2026-05-28 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
draft-melegassi-ippm-mvps-terrestrial-mobile-00
Network Working Group L. Melegassi
Internet-Draft Catellix
Intended status: Informational 28 May 2026
Expires: 29 November 2026
MVPS Terrestrial Mobile and Vehicular Profile:
Coherence Monitoring under Cellular Handover and
Radio-Access Scheduling
draft-melegassi-ippm-mvps-terrestrial-mobile-00
Abstract
This document defines the terrestrial member of the Multi-Vantage
Path Snapshot (MVPS) domain trio (space, sea, land). It targets
vantages that move on land -- vehicles, trains, drones -- connected
through cellular (5G/LTE) radio access, where the bounded joint
clock-skew axiom A1 is stressed not by clock drift (GNSS is normally
available) but by handover between base stations and slot-based
scheduling jitter.
The profile is DEFENSIVE: it concerns detection of coherence
anomalies (intrusion, communications tampering, rogue base stations).
It defines no navigation, targeting, or kinetic function. The
document proves A1 holds on the deployment tick under explicit
cellular-timing budgets, gives a closed-form maximum handover
interruption, proves Doppler is dominated at terrestrial speeds, and
inherits the core theorems via the MVPS Architecture-Invariance
Theorem. All properties are validated by
scripts/validate_terrestrial_mobile.py (7/7 PASS, exit 0) and
recorded in evidence/terrestrial_mobile_receipt.json.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six
months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents
at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as
reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 29 November 2026.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2026 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with
respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this
document must include Revised BSD License text as described in
Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without
warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1. The Space/Sea/Land Trio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.2. Defensive Scope and Non-Goals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3. The Cellular Joint-Skew Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4. Re-establishing Axiom A1 (Lemma L-TER-1) . . . . . . . . . . 6
5. Maximum Handover Interruption (Lemma L-TER-2) . . . . . . . . 6
6. Doppler Is Dominated (Lemma L-TER-4) . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
7. Inheritance of the Core Theorems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
8. Byzantine and Spoofed Vantages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
9. Rogue Base Stations (Conjecture C-TER-1) . . . . . . . . . . 9
10. Operational Logging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
11. Numerical Receipt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
12. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
13. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
14. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
14.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
14.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Appendix A. Worked Budgets (Normative) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
1. Introduction
MVPS detects network-propagating anomalies by measuring the coherence
of an observed state across multiple spatially independent vantages.
Its theorems are surface-independent: they hold where the five MVPS
axioms hold, by the Architecture-Invariance Theorem
[I-D.melegassi-iab-mvps-architecture].
Terrestrial deployments where the vantages MOVE -- fleets of
vehicles, trains, drones operating over cellular radio -- are common
and important, and they stress the timing assumptions differently
from sea or space. On land the satellite sky is normally available,
so clock holdover is not the issue; the issue is that a moving
vantage hands over between base stations and rides slot-based
scheduling, both of which perturb timing.
1.1. The Space/Sea/Land Trio
This profile is the land member of the MVPS domain trio:
o space: the orbital profile
[I-D.melegassi-ippm-mvps-orbital-coherence], stressing propagation
delay and Doppler over LEO links;
o sea: the maritime profile [I-D.melegassi-ippm-mvps-maritime-edge],
stressing intermittent connectivity and GNSS-denied holdover;
o land: this document, stressing cellular handover and radio-access
scheduling jitter.
Each re-establishes the same axiom (A1) under its domain's specific
stress and inherits the rest.
1.2. Defensive Scope and Non-Goals
This profile is strictly DEFENSIVE: detection of anomalies in network
and timing telemetry (intrusion, comms tampering, rogue base
stations).
This document does NOT define and MUST NOT be claimed to define any
navigation, guidance, targeting, or kinetic function, nor any output
other than coherence-anomaly detection and audit logs.
2. Terminology
eps_sync: GNSS/PTP residual at the base station.
eps_ta: timing-advance residual of the UE alignment.
tau_jit: radio-access scheduling jitter (slot-based).
tau_ho: residual mis-timing during or after a handover.
T_tick: the deployment coherence tick.
Make-before-break: a handover that keeps the source link until the
target is ready (NR DAPS), giving tau_ho near zero.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "SHOULD", "MAY" in this document
are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174]
when, and only when, they appear in all capitals.
3. The Cellular Joint-Skew Model
A GNSS-disciplined base station holds time to eps_sync; the UE is
aligned by Timing Advance to eps_ta. Slot-based scheduling bounds
delivery jitter by tau_jit (5G numerology mu: slot = 1 ms / 2^mu;
LTE about 1 ms). A handover adds a residual tau_ho, near zero for
make-before-break and about the interruption time otherwise. The
effective joint skew is
skew_eff = 2 * ( eps_sync + eps_ta ) + tau_jit + tau_ho .
Doppler is treated separately and shown dominated in Section 6.
4. Re-establishing Axiom A1 (Lemma L-TER-1)
Axiom A1 holds on tick T_tick iff
skew_eff = 2*(eps_sync+eps_ta) + tau_jit + tau_ho < T_tick.
For representative budgets:
5G-uRLLC (DAPS): skew_eff = 0.128 ms < 100 ms tick
LTE (break-before-make): skew_eff = 33.0 ms < 1000 ms tick
high-speed rail (300 km/h, frequent HO): 54.0 ms < 100 ms tick
All satisfy A1 (validator check L-TER-1).
5. Maximum Handover Interruption (Lemma L-TER-2)
Solving skew_eff = T_tick for the handover residual gives
tau_ho_max = T_tick - tau_jit - 2*(eps_sync + eps_ta).
For the 5G-uRLLC budget, tau_ho_max is about 99.87 ms at a 100 ms
tick. The practical reading is that the binding term on land is the
handover interruption; make-before-break drives tau_ho toward zero,
so even sub-second ticks have ample margin.
6. Doppler Is Dominated (Lemma L-TER-4)
The time uncertainty contributed by Doppler over one tick is
(v/c)*T_tick. At v = 300 km/h, v/c = 2.78e-7, so over a 100 ms tick
the term is about 27.8 ns -- under 1% of the radio-access jitter. It
is therefore absorbed and does not appear in the skew model
(validator check L-TER-4: 11.0 ns, 83.4 ns, 27.8 ns across the three
budgets).
7. Inheritance of the Core Theorems
If A1 holds (Section 4) and the compromised-vantage fraction f < 1/2,
then by the Architecture-Invariance Theorem
[I-D.melegassi-iab-mvps-architecture] the core results inherit
verbatim:
T1 multi-vantage D^2 dominates per-vantage max-z;
T2 Phi_D concentration under the null;
T3' empirical-quantile false-alarm calibration;
T9 Byzantine robustness of the geometric-median aggregator.
No core theorem is re-derived (validator check A-TER-INHERIT).
8. Byzantine and Spoofed Vantages
A vehicular fleet must assume some vantages are compromised or
spoofed. For f < 1/2 the geometric-median aggregator has finite
max-bias b(f) = C*f/(1-2f) (after [Minsker]; MVPS imported result
I12), diverging only as f -> 1/2 (validator check B-TER-1:
b(0.2)=0.333, b(0.4)=2.000).
9. Rogue Base Stations (Conjecture C-TER-1)
It is plausible that a coordinated rogue / false base-station cluster
(an IMSI-catcher fleet) injects a rank-low, correlated
timing/identity signature across mobile vantages that the
multi-vantage detector flags before any single UE alarms. This is
stated as a CONJECTURE, not a theorem, with a falsification protocol
(observable: cross-vantage correlated TA / cell-identity anomaly vs
per-UE max-z; data: fleet RAN measurement reports plus a controlled
false-base-station testbed; test: Wilson 95% lower bound on
detection-time gain > 0; blocker: licensed spectrum for the testbed).
The profile's guarantees do NOT depend on this conjecture.
10. Operational Logging
Deployments SHOULD log events using the MVPS operational log format
[I-D.melegassi-opsawg-mvps-logging], anchoring opportunistically; the
handover and cell-change events are themselves useful audit records.
11. Numerical Receipt
scripts/validate_terrestrial_mobile.py evaluates seven checks
(L-TER-1..4, A-TER-INHERIT, B-TER-1, C-TER-1) over the budgets above
and writes evidence/terrestrial_mobile_receipt.json with per-scenario
skew and Doppler values, the closed-form handover tolerance, the
inherited theorem list, the defensive non-claims, and a SHA-256 of
its own canonical body. All seven checks PASS (exit 0).
12. Security Considerations
The profile is a detection and audit capability; no kinetic or
targeting surface is added. Its value is early, coherent detection
of intrusion, comms tampering, and radio-layer attacks across a
mobile fleet, with a tamper-evident audit trail (Section 10).
Rogue-base-station detection is a conjecture (Section 9) and MUST NOT
be relied upon as a guarantee. Quantum-era integrity of logs and
anchors follows the Proof Envelope
[I-D.melegassi-ippm-mvps-proof-envelope].
13. IANA Considerations
This document has no IANA actions.
14. References
14.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, May 2017.
[I-D.melegassi-iab-mvps-architecture]
Melegassi, L., "MVPS Architecture Invariance",
draft-melegassi-iab-mvps-architecture-00, 2026.
14.2. Informative References
[I-D.melegassi-ippm-mvps-orbital-coherence]
Melegassi, L., "MVPS Orbital Coherence",
draft-melegassi-ippm-mvps-orbital-coherence-00, 2026.
[I-D.melegassi-ippm-mvps-maritime-edge]
Melegassi, L., "MVPS Maritime and Tactical-Edge Profile",
draft-melegassi-ippm-mvps-maritime-edge-00, 2026.
[I-D.melegassi-opsawg-mvps-logging]
Melegassi, L., "The MVPS Operational Log Format",
draft-melegassi-opsawg-mvps-logging-00, 2026.
[I-D.melegassi-ippm-mvps-proof-envelope]
Melegassi, L., "MVPS Proof Envelope", draft-melegassi-
ippm-mvps-proof-envelope-00, 2026.
[Minsker] Minsker, S., "Geometric median and robust estimation in
Banach spaces", Bernoulli 21(4), 2015.
Appendix A. Worked Budgets (Normative)
The three budgets of Section 4 (5G-uRLLC, LTE, high-speed rail) and
the infeasible control (150 ms handover at a 100 ms tick) are the
normative vectors. A conformant implementation MUST reproduce, for
each, the skew_eff value and the A1 verdict emitted by
scripts/validate_terrestrial_mobile.py.
Author's Address
Leonardo Melegassi
Catellix
Brazil
Email: melegassi@catellix.com