Collected Extensions to IMAP4 ABNF
draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-08
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2006-02-08
|
08 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza |
2006-02-06
|
08 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
2006-02-06
|
08 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2006-02-06
|
08 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2006-02-03
|
08 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza |
2006-02-03
|
08 | (System) | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2006-02-02 |
2006-02-02
|
08 | (System) | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by IESG Secretary |
2006-02-02
|
08 | Alex Zinin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alex Zinin by Alex Zinin |
2006-02-02
|
08 | Bill Fenner | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner |
2006-02-02
|
08 | Bert Wijnen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen |
2006-02-01
|
08 | David Kessens | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens |
2006-01-31
|
08 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley |
2006-01-31
|
08 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie |
2006-01-27
|
08 | Brian Carpenter | [Ballot comment] Editorial nits from Gen-ART review by Elwyn Davies: Abstract/s1: I guess we ought to expand ABNF on first occurrence (instead of at the … [Ballot comment] Editorial nits from Gen-ART review by Elwyn Davies: Abstract/s1: I guess we ought to expand ABNF on first occurrence (instead of at the start of s3) and give the [ABNF] reference in s1. s2.5, next to last para: s/Each modified is an/Each modifier is an/ s2.7: s/This document hasn't specified any semantical change/This document does not specify any semantic change/ s2.7: s/got extended/had already been extended/ s3, comment to definition of append-ext: s/define/defines/ |
2006-01-27
|
08 | Brian Carpenter | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Carpenter by Brian Carpenter |
2006-01-19
|
08 | Scott Hollenbeck | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::AD Followup by Scott Hollenbeck |
2006-01-19
|
08 | Scott Hollenbeck | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck |
2006-01-19
|
08 | Scott Hollenbeck | Ballot has been issued by Scott Hollenbeck |
2006-01-19
|
08 | Scott Hollenbeck | Created "Approve" ballot |
2006-01-18
|
08 | (System) | Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed |
2006-01-18
|
08 | (System) | New version available: draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-08.txt |
2006-01-17
|
08 | Scott Hollenbeck | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2006-02-02 by Scott Hollenbeck |
2006-01-17
|
08 | Scott Hollenbeck | State Changes to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Scott Hollenbeck |
2006-01-17
|
08 | Scott Hollenbeck | The document isn't consistent about listing the RFCs that it updates. That needs to be fixed before IESG evaluation. |
2006-01-17
|
08 | Scott Hollenbeck | State Changes to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from AD Evaluation by Scott Hollenbeck |
2006-01-17
|
08 | Scott Hollenbeck | State Changes to AD Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::AD Followup by Scott Hollenbeck |
2006-01-12
|
08 | (System) | Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed |
2006-01-12
|
07 | (System) | New version available: draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-07.txt |
2006-01-04
|
08 | Scott Hollenbeck | State Changes to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::AD Followup by Scott Hollenbeck |
2006-01-04
|
08 | Scott Hollenbeck | ID nits still not passing with this new version: idnits 1.85 tmp/draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-06.txt: tmp/draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-06.txt(198): Line contains a non-ascii character (?) in position 8. tmp/draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-06.txt(229): Line contains … ID nits still not passing with this new version: idnits 1.85 tmp/draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-06.txt: tmp/draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-06.txt(198): Line contains a non-ascii character (?) in position 8. tmp/draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-06.txt(229): Line contains a non-ascii character (?) in position 8. tmp/draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-06.txt(262): Line contains a non-ascii character (?) in position 8. tmp/draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-06.txt(290): Line contains a non-ascii character (?) in position 8. tmp/draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-06.txt(319): Line contains a non-ascii character (?) in position 8. tmp/draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-06.txt(360): Line contains a non-ascii character (?) in position 9. tmp/draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-06.txt(374): Line has weird spacing: '...present it co...' tmp/draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-06.txt(821): Line is too long: the offending characters are 'rs is' tmp/draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-06.txt(822): Line is too long: the offending characters are 'e BAD,' tmp/draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-06.txt(825): Line is too long: the offending characters are 'ncy.' tmp/draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-06.txt(829): Line is too long: the offending characters are 'er for' tmp/draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-06.txt(833): Line is too long: the offending characters are 'ACE' tmp/draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-06.txt(838): Line is too long: the offending characters are 'ke' tmp/draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-06.txt(839): Line is too long: the offending characters are 'less' tmp/draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-06.txt(842): Line is too long: the offending characters are ' "atom' tmp/draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-06.txt(844): Line is too long: the offending characters are 'NF for' tmp/draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-06.txt(845): Line is too long: the offending characters are 'ity' tmp/draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-06.txt(846): Line is too long: the offending characters are ' for' tmp/draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-06.txt(847): Line is too long: the offending characters are 'ntax' tmp/draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-06.txt(848): Line is too long: the offending characters are '.' Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html: Checking conformance with RFC 3978/3979 boilerplate... the boilerplate looks good. No nits found. Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.txt: - The page length should not exceed 58 lines per page, but there was 1 longer page, the longest (page 1) being 848 lines |
2005-12-28
|
08 | (System) | Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed |
2005-12-28
|
06 | (System) | New version available: draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-06.txt |
2005-11-09
|
08 | Scott Hollenbeck | State Changes to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Scott Hollenbeck |
2005-11-08
|
08 | (System) | State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system |
2005-10-26
|
08 | Michelle Cotton | IANA Last Call Comments: As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this document to have NO IANA Actions. |
2005-10-11
|
08 | Amy Vezza | Last call sent |
2005-10-11
|
08 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza |
2005-10-11
|
08 | Scott Hollenbeck | Last Call was requested by Scott Hollenbeck |
2005-10-11
|
08 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
2005-10-11
|
08 | (System) | Last call text was added |
2005-10-11
|
08 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
2005-10-11
|
08 | Scott Hollenbeck | State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Scott Hollenbeck |
2005-10-11
|
08 | Scott Hollenbeck | AD evaluation comments: IDNits: idnits 1.80 tmp/draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-05.txt: tmp/draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-05.txt(713): Line is too long: the offending characters are 'rs is' tmp/draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-05.txt(714): Line is too long: the offending … AD evaluation comments: IDNits: idnits 1.80 tmp/draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-05.txt: tmp/draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-05.txt(713): Line is too long: the offending characters are 'rs is' tmp/draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-05.txt(714): Line is too long: the offending characters are 'e BAD,' tmp/draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-05.txt(717): Line is too long: the offending characters are 'ncy.' tmp/draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-05.txt(721): Line is too long: the offending characters are 'er for' tmp/draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-05.txt(725): Line is too long: the offending characters are 'ACE' Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html: * The document seems to lack an Introduction section. Checking conformance with RFC 3978/3979 boilerplate... the boilerplate looks good. Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.txt: - The page length should not exceed 58 lines per page, but there was 1 longer page, the longest (page 1) being 728 lines Miscellaneous warnings: None. Please fix these prior to IESG evaluation. The reference to RFC 2234 needs to be updated to cite RFC 4234. |
2005-10-11
|
08 | Scott Hollenbeck | State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Scott Hollenbeck |
2005-10-11
|
08 | Scott Hollenbeck | Draft Added by Scott Hollenbeck in state Publication Requested |
2005-10-10
|
05 | (System) | New version available: draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-05.txt |
2005-09-22
|
04 | (System) | New version available: draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-04.txt |
2005-07-18
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-03.txt |
2005-06-01
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-02.txt |
2005-04-05
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-01.txt |
2005-03-09
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-00.txt |