Skip to main content

Clarifying RPKI use of CMS SignerInfo
draft-michaelson-signerinfo-00

The information below is for an old version of the document.
Document Type
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Expired".
Authors George G. Michaelson , Geoff Huston
Last updated 2014-01-20
RFC stream (None)
Formats
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state I-D Exists
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)
draft-michaelson-signerinfo-00
Internet Engineering Task Force                            G. Michaelson
Internet-Draft                                                 G. Huston
Updates: 6485 (if approved)                                        APNIC
Intended status: Standards Track                        January 20, 2014
Expires: July 24, 2014

                 Clarifying RPKI use of CMS SignerInfo
                     draft-michaelson-signerinfo-00

Abstract

   RFC6485 section 2 mandated a single CMS OID sha256withRSAEncryption
   from RFC4055 for use in the CMS SignerInfo field.  This draft updates
   RFC6485 and extends it to permit the correct CMS use which includes
   an option of rsaEncryption for the SignerInfo field.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on July 24, 2014.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Michaelson & Huston       Expires July 24, 2014                 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft              Abbreviated Title               January 2014

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
     1.1.  Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  Revised CMS SignerInfo  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   3.  Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   4.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   5.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   6.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     6.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     6.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4

1.  Introduction

   RFC 6485 [RFC6485] defines The Profile for Algorithms and Key Sizes
   for Use in the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI).  In that
   document, Section 2 specifies a single signature algorithm (SHA-246)
   and a single CMS OID, sha256withRSAEncryption, to be used for the
   SignerInfo field of the CMS object.

   A closer reading of the relevant RFCs RFC 4055 [RFC4055] and RFC 5754
   [RFC5754] identified that the CMS SignerInfo field must support use
   of the rsaEncryption OID for full conformance with the CMS
   specifications, and the normative references in RFC 6485 inherit this
   requirement.

   To ensure conformance with the CMS specifications, RFC 6485 is
   updated by this draft.  All of RFC 6485 applies except for a change
   to the SignerInfo field.

1.1.  Requirements Language

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].

2.  Revised CMS SignerInfo

Michaelson & Huston       Expires July 24, 2014                 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft              Abbreviated Title               January 2014

   In RFC 6485, Section 2 the following sentence:

      The Object Identifier (OID) sha256withRSAEncryption from [RFC4055]
      MUST be used.

   is replaced by:

      One of the Object Identifiers (OID) rsaEncryption or
      sha256WithRSAEncryption from [RFC4055] MUST be used.  RPKI
      implementations MUST support rsaEncryption for the
      signatureAlgorithm field and SHOULD support
      sha256WithRSAEncryption.

3.  Acknowledgements

   This draft reflects a discussion between Rob Austein and Matt
   Lepinski on the SIDR Working group mailing list and a private
   communication between Rob Austein and Geoff Huston.

4.  IANA Considerations

   This memo includes no request to IANA.

5.  Security Considerations

   By conforming more closely to the CMS specifications, RPKI CMS
   objects are less likely to be rejected as non-conformant with the
   standards.  No change is made to the cryptographic status of the CMS
   objects produced.

6.  References

6.1.  Normative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

   [RFC4055]  Schaad, J., Kaliski, B., and R. Housley, "Additional
              Algorithms and Identifiers for RSA Cryptography for use in
              the Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate
              and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile", RFC 4055,
              June 2005.

   [RFC5754]  Turner, S., "Using SHA2 Algorithms with Cryptographic
              Message Syntax", RFC 5754, January 2010.

Michaelson & Huston       Expires July 24, 2014                 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft              Abbreviated Title               January 2014

   [RFC6485]  Huston, G., "The Profile for Algorithms and Key Sizes for
              Use in the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI)", RFC
              6485, February 2012.

6.2.  Informative References

   [AUSTEIN]  Austein, SR., "RFC 6485 is inconsistent with base CMS
              specifications", 2012, <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/
              web/sidr/current/msg04813.html>.

Authors' Addresses

   George Michaelson
   APNIC
   6 Cordelia St, South Brisbane
   Brisbane, Queensland  4101
   AU

   Phone: +61 7 3858 3150
   Email: ggm@apnic.net

   Geoff Huston
   APNIC

   Email: gih@apnic.net

Michaelson & Huston       Expires July 24, 2014                 [Page 4]