%% You should probably cite draft-mishra-v6ops-variable-slaac-problem-stmt-06 instead of this revision.
@techreport{mishra-v6ops-variable-slaac-problem-stmt-03,
    number =    {draft-mishra-v6ops-variable-slaac-problem-stmt-03},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mishra-v6ops-variable-slaac-problem-stmt/03/},
    author =    {Gyan Mishra and Alexandre Petrescu and Naveen Kottapalli and Dusan Mudric and Dmytro Shytyi},
    title =     {{SLAAC with prefixes of arbitrary length in PIO (Variable SLAAC) - A Problem Statement}},
    pagetotal = 13,
    year =      2022,
    month =     jan,
    day =       20,
    abstract =  {In the past, various IPv6 addressing models have been proposed based on a subnet hierarchy embedding a 64-bit prefix. The last remnant of IPv6 classful addressing is a inflexible interface identifier boundary at /64. This document details the 64-bit boundary problem statement.},
}