Marking Methods for Performance Measurement
draft-mizrahi-ippm-marking-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Tal Mizrahi , Giuseppe Fioccola , Mauro Cociglio , Mach Chen , Greg Mirsky | ||
| Last updated | 2022-04-28 (Latest revision 2021-10-25) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This memo presents a summary of marking methods for performance measurements, and discusses the tradeoffs among them. These marking methods enable to measure various performance metrics such as packet loss and delay, and require a low overhead in the header of data packets, as low as one or two bits per packet, or in some cases even zero bits per packet. The target audience of this document is network protocol designers; this document is intended to help protocol designers choose the best marking method(s) based on the protocol's constraints and requirements.
Authors
Tal Mizrahi
Giuseppe Fioccola
Mauro Cociglio
Mach Chen
Greg Mirsky
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)