%% You should probably cite rfc7544 instead of this I-D. @techreport{mohali-rfc6044bis-00, number = {draft-mohali-rfc6044bis-00}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mohali-rfc6044bis/00/}, author = {Marianne Mohali}, title = {{Mapping and interworking of Diversion information Between Diversion and History-Info Headers in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)}}, pagetotal = 25, year = 2014, month = feb, day = 14, abstract = {{[}This version of the document is a draft version for an RFC6044bis that will describe the mapping between the Diversion header defined in RFC5806 and the new History-Info header defined in RFC7044.{]} Although the SIP History-Info header is the solution adopted in IETF, the non-standard Diversion header is nevertheless already implemented and used for conveying call diversion related information in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) signaling. This document describes a recommended interworking guideline between the Diversion header and the History-Info header to handle call diversion information. In addition, an interworking policy is proposed to manage the headers' coexistence. The non-standard Diversion header is described, as Historic, in {[}RFC5806{]}. The History-Info header is described in {[}RFC7044{]} that obsoletes {[}RFC4244{]} initially describing the History-Info header. {[}RFC7044{]} defines an optional SIP header field, History-Info, for capturing the history information in requests and SIP header field parameters for the History-Info and Contact header fields to tag the method by which the target of a request is determined. RFC7044 also defines a value for the Privacy header field that directs the anonymization of values in the History-Info header field. Since the Diversion header is used in existing network implementations for the transport of call diversion information, its interworking with the SIP History-Info standardized solution is needed. This work is intended to enable the migration from non- standard implementations and deployment toward IETF specification- based implementations and deployment. This document obsoletes {[}RFC6044{]}.}, }