%% You should probably cite draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-bum-opt-01 instead of this revision.
@techreport{mohanty-bess-evpn-bum-opt-00,
    number =    {draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-bum-opt-00},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-bum-opt/00/},
    author =    {Satya Mohanty and Mrinmoy Ghosh and Sandy Breeze and Jim Uttaro},
    title =     {{BGP EVPN Flood Traffic Optimization}},
    pagetotal = 9,
    year =      2018,
    month =     mar,
    day =       5,
    abstract =  {In EVPN, the Broadcast, Unknown Unicast and Multicast (BUM) traffic is sent to all the routers participating in the EVPN instance. In a multi-homing scenario, when more than one PEs share the same Ethernet Segment, i.e. there are more than one PEs in a redundancy group, only the PE that is the Designated-Forwarder (DF) for the ES will forward that packet on the access interface whereas all non-DF PEs will drop the packet. From the perspective of the network, this is quite wasteful. This is especially true if there are significantly more PEs on the Ethernet Segment. This draft explores this problem and provides a solution for the same.},
}