DNS IPv6 Transport Operational Guidelines
draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis-07
| Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(dnsop WG)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Momoka Yamamoto , Tobias Fiebig | ||
| Last updated | 2025-03-12 (Latest revision 2025-02-09) | ||
| Replaced by | draft-ietf-dnsop-3901bis | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | Adopted by a WG | |
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-dnsop-3901bis | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This memo provides guidelines and documents Best Current Practice for operating authoritative and recursive DNS servers, given that queries and responses are carried in a mixed environment of IPv4 and IPv6 networks. This document expands on RFC 3901 by recommending that authoritative and recursive resolvers support both IPv4 and IPv6. This document obsoletes RFC3901. (if approved) Discussion Venues This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC. Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at https://github.com/momoka0122y/draft-dnsop-3901bis.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)