%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-dnsop-3901bis instead of this I-D.
@techreport{momoka-dnsop-3901bis-07,
    number =    {draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis-07},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis/07/},
    author =    {Momoka Yamamoto and Tobias Fiebig},
    title =     {{DNS IPv6 Transport Operational Guidelines}},
    pagetotal = 10,
    year =      2025,
    month =     feb,
    day =       9,
    abstract =  {This memo provides guidelines and documents Best Current Practice for operating authoritative and recursive DNS servers, given that queries and responses are carried in a mixed environment of IPv4 and IPv6 networks. This document expands on RFC 3901 by recommending that authoritative and recursive resolvers support both IPv4 and IPv6. This document obsoletes RFC3901. (if approved) Discussion Venues This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC. Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at https://github.com/momoka0122y/draft-dnsop-3901bis.},
}