%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-ippm-2330-ipv6 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{morton-ippm-2330-stdform-typep-02,
    number =    {draft-morton-ippm-2330-stdform-typep-02},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-morton-ippm-2330-stdform-typep/02/},
    author =    {Al Morton and Joachim Fabini and Nalini Elkins and michael ackermann and Vinayak Hegde},
    title =     {{IP Options and IPv6 Updates for IPPM's Active Metric Framework: Packets of Type-P and Standard-Formed Packets}},
    pagetotal = 11,
    year =      2015,
    month =     dec,
    day =       11,
    abstract =  {This memo updates the IP Performance Metrics (IPPM) Framework RFC 2330 with new considerations for measurement methodology and testing. The memo updates the definition of standard-formed packets in RFC 2330 to include IPv6 packets. It also augments distinguishing aspects of packets, referred to as Type-P for test packets in RFC 2330. Two points (at least) are worthwhile discussing further: extent of coverage for 6LO and IPv6 Header Compression, and the continued need to define a "minimal standard-formed packet".},
}