Lab Test Results for Advancing Metrics on the Standards Track
draft-morton-ippm-advance-metrics-02
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Al Morton | ||
| Last updated | 2010-10-25 (Latest revision 2010-06-25) | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
plain text
html
xml
htmlized
pdfized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-morton-ippm-advance-metrics-02.txt
Abstract
This memo supports the process of progressing performance metric RFCs along the standards track. Observing that the metric definitions themselves should be the primary focus rather than the implementations of metrics, this memo describes results of example lab test procedures to evaluate specific metric RFC requirement clauses to determine if the requirement has been implemented as intended. A single implementation has been tested against the key specifications of RFC 2679 on One-way Delay.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)