Packet Delay Variation Applicability Statement
draft-morton-ippm-delay-var-as-04
| Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(individual in gen area)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Al Morton , Benoît Claise | ||
| Last updated | 2015-10-14 (Latest revision 2007-11-18) | ||
| Replaced by | draft-ietf-ippm-delay-var-as | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | WG state | (None) | |
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-ippm-delay-var-as | |
| Action Holders |
(None)
|
||
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | Lars Eggert | ||
| Send notices to | ippm-chairs@ietf.org |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Packet delay variation metrics appear in many different standards documents. The metric definition in RFC 3393 has considerable flexibility, and it allows multiple formulations of delay variation through the specification of different packet selection functions. Although flexibility provides wide coverage and room for new ideas, it can make comparisons of independent implementations more difficult. Two different formulations of delay variation have come into wide use in the context of active measurements. This memo examines a range of circumstances for active measurements of delay variation and their uses, and recommends which of the two forms is best matched to particular conditions and tasks.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)