%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-ippm-initial-registry instead of this I-D.
@techreport{morton-ippm-initial-registry-03,
    number =    {draft-morton-ippm-initial-registry-03},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-morton-ippm-initial-registry/03/},
    author =    {Al Morton and Marcelo Bagnulo and Philip Eardley and Kevin D'Souza},
    title =     {{Initial Performance Metric Registry Entries}},
    pagetotal = 62,
    year =      2016,
    month =     jan,
    day =       2,
    abstract =  {This memo defines the Initial Entries for the Performance Metrics Registry. In version 02, Section 4 has been edited to reflect recent discussion on the ippm-list: * Removed the combination or "Raw" and left 95th percentile. * Hanging Indent on Run-time parameters (Fixed parameters use bullet lists and other indenting formats. * Payload format for measurement has been removed. * Explanation of Conditional delay distribution. Version 03 addressed Phil Eardley's comments and suggestions in sections 1-4. and resolved the definition of Percentiles. Still need: * suggestion of standard naming format for parameters. * usecase(s) for machine parse-able registry columns. * Contribution of YANG references for alternate data formats. Note: lambda parameter description is correct in section 4, elsewhere needs fix.},
}