Reporting Metrics: Different Points of View
draft-morton-ippm-reporting-metrics-07
Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(individual in gen area)
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Al Morton , Gomathi Ramachandran , Ganga Maguluri | ||
Last updated | 2015-10-14 (Latest revision 2009-07-07) | ||
Replaced by | draft-ietf-ippm-reporting-metrics | ||
RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
Formats | |||
Stream | WG state | (None) | |
Document shepherd | (None) | ||
IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-ippm-reporting-metrics | |
Action Holders |
(None)
|
||
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | Lars Eggert | ||
Send notices to | ippm-chairs@ietf.org |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Consumers of IP network performance metrics have many different uses in mind. This memo categorizes the different audience points of view. It describes how the categories affect the selection of metric parameters and options when seeking info that serves their needs. The memo then proceeds to discuss "long-term" reporting considerations (e.g, days, weeks or months, as opposed to 10 seconds).
Authors
Al Morton
Gomathi Ramachandran
Ganga Maguluri
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)