RFC 4148 and the IP Performance Metrics (IPPM) Registry of Metrics Are Obsolete
draft-morton-ippm-rfc4148-obsolete-03
Yes
(Adrian Farrel)
(Lars Eggert)
(Ron Bonica)
No Objection
(Alexey Melnikov)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Jari Arkko)
(Russ Housley)
(Tim Polk)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2011-01-31)
Unknown
This Informational document is Obsoleting a BCP (4148 is also BCP 108). Given 4148's content, I agree with the choice of this document's intended status.
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-02-03)
Unknown
1. It would be useful to introduce a terminology section that would explain terms like 'zombie' and 'apocalypse' used in the Security Considerations section. 2. In the IANA Considerations section: > The registry will no longer be updated, and the current contents will be maintained as-is on the day that RFC XXXX was published. As this is text to be appended to the Description of the registry on the IANA Web site, it would be useful I think to specify explicitly the date of publication of the RFC - which is also the date of definitive freeze of the registry.
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-01-30)
Unknown
While the security considerations made me laugh out loud (thanks for that), I think it should probably be amended to strike the parenthetical.
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-02-01)
Unknown
Please add a reference to Zombie_apocalypse, for example http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zombie_apocalypse
Tim Polk Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-01-30)
Unknown
I would like to see the security considerations expanded to explain the environments where the risk of a zombie apocalypse is considered most likely, and any suggested mitigations.