Test Plan and Results for Advancing RFC 2679 on the Standards Track
draft-morton-ippm-testplan-rfc2679-01
| Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Len Ciavattone , Ruediger Geib , Al Morton , Matthias Wieser | ||
| Last updated | 2013-02-20 (Latest revision 2011-06-29) | ||
| Replaced by | draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2679 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2679 | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This memo proposes to advance a performance metric RFC along the standards track, specifically RFC 2679 on One-way Delay Metrics. Observing that the metric definitions themselves should be the primary focus rather than the implementations of metrics, this memo describes the test procedures to evaluate specific metric requirement clauses to determine if the requirement has been interpreted and implemented as intended. Two completely independent implementations have been tested against the key specifications of RFC 2679.
Authors
Len Ciavattone
Ruediger Geib
Al Morton
Matthias Wieser
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)