datatracker.ietf.org
Sign in
Version 5.3.0, 2014-04-12
Report a bug

Test Plan and Results for Advancing RFC 2680 on the Standards Track
draft-morton-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-02

Document type: Replaced Internet-Draft (individual in tsv area)
Document stream: IETF
Last updated: 2013-02-20 (latest revision 2012-03-11)
Intended RFC status: Informational
Other versions: (expired, archived): plain text, pdf, html

IETF State: (None)
Consensus: Unknown
Document shepherd: No shepherd assigned

IESG State: Replaced by draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680
Responsible AD: Wesley Eddy
Send notices to: lencia@att.com, Ruediger.Geib@telekom.de, acmorton@att.com, matthias.wieser@stud.h-da.de, draft-morton-ippm-testplan-rfc2680@tools.ietf.org

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. Unofficial copies of old Internet-Drafts can be found here:
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-morton-ippm-testplan-rfc2680

Abstract

This memo proposes to advance a performance metric RFC along the standards track, specifically RFC 2680 on One-way Loss Metrics. Observing that the metric definitions themselves should be the primary focus rather than the implementations of metrics, this memo describes the test procedures to evaluate specific metric requirement clauses to determine if the requirement has been interpreted and implemented as intended. Two completely independent implementations have been tested against the key specifications of RFC 2680. In this version, the results are presented in the R-tool output form. Beautification is future work.

Authors

Len Ciavattone <lencia@att.com>
Ruediger Geib <Ruediger.Geib@telekom.de>
Al Morton <acmorton@att.com>
Matthias Wieser <matthias_michael.wieser@stud.tu-darmstadt.de>

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid)