Interflow vs Intraflow Delays
draft-morton-tsvwg-interflow-intraflow-delays-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Jonathan Morton , Peter G. Heist | ||
| Last updated | 2021-11-18 (Latest revision 2021-05-17) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Much current literature discusses queuing delays, and the effects of different queue disciplines, active queue management algorithms, and congestion control measures on these delays. This draft highlights an important distinction between different types of delay, which may be helpful to practitioners and theoreticians alike.
Authors
Jonathan Morton
Peter G. Heist
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)