Skip to main content

SMTP Operational Experience in Mixed IPv4/v6 Environments
draft-motonori-dualstack-smtp-requirement-01

Yes

(Bert Wijnen)

No Objection

(David Kessens)
(Margaret Cullen)
(Russ Housley)
(Ted Hardie)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01 and is now closed.

Bert Wijnen Former IESG member
Yes
Yes () Unknown

                            
Allison Mankin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2004-08-19) Unknown
Process nit:  RFC 3178 is an Info, needs to move to the Informatives...  (I think there is a split set of
references already, but the Normatives are not called that).  Also Mokapetris -> Mockapetris

I'm glad of Ted's review.  I could imagine that this document, which folks in Japan felt was very
much needed, and I agree is on an important topic, was just not progressing due to IETF WG
charter-related problems?
David Kessens Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Harald Alvestrand Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2004-08-19) Unknown
Reviewed by Mark Allman, Gen-ART

Note: Agree with Ted that the quality of the prose is not terribly good.
Margaret Cullen Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Scott Hollenbeck Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2004-08-10) Unknown
References need to be split normative/informative.
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection () Unknown