%% You should probably cite rfc9199 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{moura-dnsop-authoritative-recommendations-04,
    number =    {draft-moura-dnsop-authoritative-recommendations-04},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-moura-dnsop-authoritative-recommendations/04/},
    author =    {Giovane Moura and Wes Hardaker and John Heidemann and Marco Davids},
    title =     {{Considerations for Large Authoritative DNS Servers Operators}},
    pagetotal = 17,
    year =      ,
    month =     ,
    day =       ,
    abstract =  {This document summarizes recent research work exploring DNS configurations and offers specific, tangible considerations to operators for configuring authoritative servers. This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes. Ed note This draft will be renamed to draft-moura-dnsop-large-authoritative- considerations in case adpoted by the WG, to reflect the new title. Text inside square brackets ({[}RF:ABC{]}) refers to: o individual comments we have received about the draft, and enumerated under \textless{}https://github.com/gmmoura/draft-moura-dnsop- authoritative-recommendations/blob/master/reviews/reviews- dnsop.md\textgreater{}. o Issues listed on our Github repository Both types will be removed before publication. This draft is being hosted on GitHub - \textless{}https://github.com/gmmoura/ draft-moura-dnsop-authoritative-recommendations\textgreater{}, where the most recent version of the document and open issues can be found. The authors gratefully accept pull requests.},
}