%% You should probably cite draft-mw-oauth-actor-chain instead of this I-D.
@techreport{mw-spice-actor-chain-01,
    number =    {draft-mw-spice-actor-chain-01},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mw-spice-actor-chain/01/},
    author =    {A Prasad and Ramki Krishnan and Diego Lopez and Srinivasa Addepalli},
    title =     {{Cryptographically Verifiable Actor Chains for OAuth 2.0 Token Exchange}},
    pagetotal = 62,
    year =      ,
    month =     ,
    day =       ,
    abstract =  {This document defines five actor-chain profiles for OAuth 2.0 Token Exchange \{\{!RFC8693\}\}. \{\{!RFC8693\}\} permits nested act claims, but prior actors remain informational only and token exchange does not define how a delegation path is preserved and validated across successive exchanges. This document defines profile-specific processing for linear multi- hop workflows. The profiles are Asserted Delegation Path, Selectively Disclosed Asserted Delegation Path, Committed Delegation Path, Commitment-Only Delegation Path, and Selectively Disclosed Committed Delegation Path. These profiles preserve the existing meanings of sub and act, support same- domain and cross-domain delegation, require sender-constrained tokens, and provide different tradeoffs among readable chain-based authorization, cryptographic accountability, auditability, privacy, and long-running workflow support.},
}