%% You should probably cite draft-nagesh-mptcp-feature-negotiation-ps-01 instead of this revision.
@techreport{nagesh-mptcp-feature-negotiation-ps-00,
    number =    {draft-nagesh-mptcp-feature-negotiation-ps-00},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nagesh-mptcp-feature-negotiation-ps/00/},
    author =    {Nagesh Shamnur and Zhen Cao},
    title =     {{Problem Statement of MPTCP Transmission Feature Negotiation}},
    pagetotal = 9,
    year =      2019,
    month =     nov,
    day =       4,
    abstract =  {Path manager and packet scheduler are two important components of MPTCP protocol and associated implementations. Normally they are implemented and configured statically. This draft discusses the scenarios where statically configured path manager and packet scheduler are not sufficient, and presents the cases that deserve the negotiation of these multipath transmission features which are currently not addressed by MTPCP.},
}