Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping/Traceroute for Segment Routing SIDs with MPLS Data-plane
draft-nainar-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-sids-00
Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Nagendra Kumar Nainar , Carlos Pignataro , faiqbal@cisco.com , Zafar Ali | ||
Last updated | 2019-04-26 (Latest revision 2018-10-23) | ||
RFC stream | (None) | ||
Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
Formats | |||
Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
RFC8402 introduces Segment Routing architecture that leverages source routing and tunneling paradigms and can be directly applied to the Multi Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) data plane. A node steers a packet through a controlled set of instructions called segments, by prepending the packet with Segment Routing header. SR architecture defines different types of segments with different forwarding semantics associated. RFC8287 defines the extensions to MPLS LSP Ping and Traceroute for Segment Routing IGP-Prefix and IGP-Adjacency Segment Identifier (SIDs) with an MPLS data plane. RFC8287 defines the Target FEC Stack Sub-TLVs and the procedures to apply RFC8029 on SR architecture with MPLS data plane. This document defines the Target FEC Stack Sub-TLVs and the extension required for other SR Segments.
Authors
Nagendra Kumar Nainar
Carlos Pignataro
faiqbal@cisco.com
Zafar Ali
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)