Comparison and integration of IVI, IVI+DHCP, 1:N IVI and SIPNAT
draft-nat46compare-perkins-01
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Charles E. Perkins , Xing Li , Congxiao Bao | ||
| Last updated | 2010-03-08 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
IVI, IVI + DHCPv6, 1:N IVI, Bidirectional NAT, and SIPNAT have been proposed to global Internet access to IPv6-only domains. These methods are not all mutually exclusive, and we propose that IVI (along with its variants) along with SIPNAT may be considered together as a more complete solution for enabling access from today's IPv4 global Internet into IPv6-only domains. This would likely have the effect of accelerating the adoption of IPv6, since with such access enablements there would be much reduced incentive for new deployments to require IPv4 addressability. As part of the discussion, we also include a comparison of the various techniques so the relative trade-offs may be more easily understood.
Authors
Charles E. Perkins
Xing Li
Congxiao Bao
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)