Using SCTP as a Transport Layer Protocol for HTTP
draft-natarajan-httpbis-sctp-00

Document Type Replaced Internet-Draft (individual)
Authors Preethi Natarajan  , Paul Amer  , Jonathan Leighton  , Fred Baker 
Last updated 2008-11-18 (latest revision 2008-10-27)
Replaced by draft-natarajan-http-over-sctp
Stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Expired & archived
plain text html xml pdf htmlized bibtex
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state Replaced by draft-natarajan-http-over-sctp
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-natarajan-httpbis-sctp-00.txt

Abstract

Hyper-Text Transfer Protocol (HTTP) [RFC2116] requires a reliable transport for end-to-end communication. While historically TCP has been used for this purpose, this document proposes an alternative -- the Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) [RFC4960]. Similar to TCP, SCTP offers a reliable end-to-end transport connection to applications. Additionally, SCTP offers other innovative services unavailable in TCP. The objectives of this draft are three-fold: (i) to highlight SCTP services that better match HTTP's needs than TCP, (ii) to propose a design for persistent and pipelined HTTP 1.1 transactions over SCTP's multistreaming service, and (iii) to share some lessons learned from implementing HTTP over SCTP. Finally, open issues warranting more discussion and/or investigation are listed.

Authors

Preethi Natarajan (nataraja@cis.udel.edu)
Paul Amer (amer@cis.udel.edu)
Jonathan Leighton (leighton@cis.udel.edu)
Fred Baker (fred@cisco.com)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)