Analysis for the Differences Between Standard Congestion Control Schemes
draft-nishida-ccwg-standard-cc-analysis-01
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Yoshifumi Nishida | ||
| Last updated | 2024-01-25 (Latest revision 2023-07-23) | ||
| Replaces | draft-nishida-tcpm-standard-cc-analysis | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Reno-based congestion control has been referred as the standard document from IETF for long time that describes congestion control principle of the Internet. In the meantime, IETF recently has published two new congestion control standards that use slightly different schemes from the previous one. This document provides analysis for the differences between these standards in order to provide helpful information when an unified congestion control principles for the Internet is standardized in the future.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)