HTTP Header Field Registrations
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.
(Scott Hollenbeck) Yes
(Brian Carpenter) No Objection
(Bill Fenner) No Objection
A minor comment: I was confused by Related information: spoof in 2.1.3; after reading the reference I realized that it was because it was defined in an April 1 RFC; when I first read it I thought maybe it was warning that this header was vulnerable to spoofing, or some such thing.
(Ted Hardie) No Objection
(David Kessens) No Objection
(Mark Townsley) No Objection
(Bert Wijnen) No Objection
It seems to me that none of the keywords from RFC2119 are used and so section 1.1 plus the normative reference  are (I think) irrelevant to this document.