HTTP Header Field Registrations
draft-nottingham-hdrreg-http-05
Yes
(Scott Hollenbeck)
No Objection
(Brian Carpenter)
(David Kessens)
(Mark Townsley)
(Ted Hardie)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.
Scott Hollenbeck Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Bert Wijnen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2005-07-21)
Unknown
It seems to me that none of the keywords from RFC2119 are used and so section 1.1 plus the normative reference [2] are (I think) irrelevant to this document.
Bill Fenner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2005-07-20)
Unknown
A minor comment: I was confused by Related information: spoof in 2.1.3; after reading the reference I realized that it was because it was defined in an April 1 RFC; when I first read it I thought maybe it was warning that this header was vulnerable to spoofing, or some such thing.
Brian Carpenter Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
David Kessens Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Mark Townsley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown