Web Linking
draft-nottingham-http-link-header-10
Yes
(Alexey Melnikov)
(Jari Arkko)
(Lisa Dusseault)
No Objection
(Adrian Farrel)
(Dan Romascanu)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Robert Sparks)
(Russ Housley)
(Sean Turner)
(Tim Polk)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 10 and is now closed.
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Lisa Dusseault Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
Yes
Yes
(2010-04-30)
Unknown
I am now satisfied that the "hub" relation will be more clearly defined in the next version of the PubsubHubbub specification, although I agree that the pointer from the registry should be to the specification itself, not the general website for the project.
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2010-04-20)
Unknown
[TBD]@ietf.org and [TBD-2]@ietf.org mailing lists need to be created and an RFC Editor Note needs to ask them to substitute the final names.
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Sean Turner Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Tim Polk Former IESG member
(was No Record, Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2010-04-22)
Unknown
The document has a novel approach to expert review, with expiration of a timer failing over to the IESG. Within at most 14 days of the request, the Designated Expert(s) will either approve or deny the registration request, communicating this decision to the review list. Denials should include an explanation and, if applicable, suggestions as to how to make the request successful. Registration requests that are undetermined for a period longer than 21 days can be brought to the IESG's attention (using the iesg@iesg.org mailing list) for resolution. Vanilla expert review would be better...