Web Linking
draft-nottingham-rfc5988bis-08
Yes
(Alexey Melnikov)
No Objection
(Alia Atlas)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Eric Rescorla)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Suresh Krishnan)
(Terry Manderson)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.
Warren Kumari
No Objection
Comment
(2017-08-01 for -07)
Unknown
ART and others are more qualified to make useful determinations here, so I'll restrict myself to nits. :-P 1: The Note to Readers should have an "RFC Editor, please remove" tag. 2: Section 2: " A link can be viewed as a statement of the form "_link context_ has a _link relation type_ resource at _link target_, which has _targetattributes_". If possible, it would be really helpful to have an example here - this may be clear to those schooled in the arts, but I found this hard to parse, and required much flipping back and forth to understand.
Adam Roach Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
Yes
Yes
(2017-08-14)
Unknown
Thanks for addressing my discuss.
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -07)
Unknown
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Unknown
Ben Campbell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2017-08-02 for -07)
Unknown
- Since this seems to be the week for this recurring controversy: I agree with Mirja that the abstract should mention that this obsoletes 5988. 2.1.1.1 and 2.1.1.2 seem to entirely contain IANA considerations. It seems a bit strange to specify them here and reference them from the IANA section. (I can accept this as a stylistic choice, but it creates additional work for anyone who came to this draft primarily to learn the IANA bits.) - 2.1.1.1: "The expert(s) MAY define additional fields to be collected in the registry." How should they go about doing that? - 2.1.1.2: It seems like a mild abuse of the spirit of 2119 to put MUST and SHOULD requirements on the designated experts.
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Unknown
Eric Rescorla Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2017-08-02 for -07)
Unknown
It would be good to include a reference to RFC7525 in the security considerations section when talking about using TLS. Thanks.
Mirja Kühlewind Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2017-07-28 for -07)
Unknown
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Unknown
Suresh Krishnan Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Unknown
Terry Manderson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Unknown