Delivered-Enc Email Header Field
draft-nurpmeso-delivered-enc-01
This document is an Internet-Draft (I-D).
Anyone may submit an I-D to the IETF.
This I-D is not endorsed by the IETF and has no formal standing in the
IETF standards process.
| Document | Type | Active Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Steffen Nurpmeso | ||
| Last updated | 2026-08-04 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
draft-nurpmeso-delivered-enc-01
Network Working Group S. Nurpmeso, Ed.
Internet-Draft 3 August 2026
Intended status: Informational
Expires: 4 February 2027
Delivered-Enc Email Header Field
draft-nurpmeso-delivered-enc-01
Abstract
Cryptographically protected email aims in hiding and protecting.
Extending this to an uppermost extend also for trace headers, and/or
the transport layer, so that only directly involved hops, which need
to have a notion to "know", the sending system and/or the receiving
system thus, can interpret certain header information, can be
important. This document ensures that only the receiving system, in
its desire to prevent email loops, can interpret the real content of
the delivery notice header.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 4 February 2027.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2026 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document.
Nurpmeso Expires 4 February 2027 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Delivered-Enc Email Header Field August 2026
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Encrypting information to protect email . . . . . . . . . . . 2
3. Delivered-Enc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
4. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
5. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
6. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1. Introduction
The SMTP[RFC5321] protocol documents in section 6.3 "Loop Detection"
an approach to prevent infinite email loops. In operational practice
explicit trace header fields were in use for decades, to record
delivery addresses, and to shortcut loop detection, and avoid simple
counting mechanisms, until [RFC9228] created an IETF document that
describes one of the solutions used in practice, the "Delivered-To
Email Header Field".
2. Encrypting information to protect email
This document introduces a new header field that has the same
purpose, and (likely) records the same information that RFC 9228
describes, it however encourages systems to encrypt any content the
header field might have, and produce and store solely BASE64[RFC4648]
encoded output. Only the local system (any party owning the
encryption key) will be capable to decrypt the real content in this
scenario, and therefore only interested parties for which the
information makes sense. This covers another aspect when
cryptographically protecting email[RFC9788], for example in an end-
to-end security scenario[RFC9787].
3. Delivered-Enc
The syntax of the header field is:
"Delivered-Enc:" FWS BASE64 FWS CRLF ; BASE64 from RFC4648
4. IANA Considerations
This document would request registration of the header field name
"Delivered-Enc".
5. Security Considerations
Encrypting trace header content may improve security.
Nurpmeso Expires 4 February 2027 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft Delivered-Enc Email Header Field August 2026
6. Informative References
[RFC4648] Josefsson, S., "The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data
Encodings", RFC 4648, DOI 10.17487/RFC4648, October 2006,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4648>.
[RFC5321] Klensin, J., "Simple Mail Transfer Protocol", RFC 5321,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5321, October 2008,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5321>.
[RFC9228] Crocker, D., Ed., "Delivered-To Email Header Field",
RFC 9228, DOI 10.17487/RFC9228, April 2022,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9228>.
[RFC9787] Gillmor, D. K., Ed., Melnikov, A., Ed., and B. Hoeneisen,
Ed., "Guidance on End-to-End Email Security", RFC 9787,
DOI 10.17487/RFC9787, August 2025,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9787>.
[RFC9788] Gillmor, D. K., Hoeneisen, B., and A. Melnikov, "Header
Protection for Cryptographically Protected Email",
RFC 9788, DOI 10.17487/RFC9788, August 2025,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9788>.
Author's Address
Steffen Nurpmeso (editor)
Email: steffen@sdaoden.eu
Nurpmeso Expires 4 February 2027 [Page 3]