Skip to main content

Delivered-Enc Email Header Field
draft-nurpmeso-delivered-enc-01

Document Type Active Internet-Draft (individual)
Author Steffen Nurpmeso
Last updated 2026-08-04
RFC stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state I-D Exists
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)
draft-nurpmeso-delivered-enc-01
Network Working Group                                   S. Nurpmeso, Ed.
Internet-Draft                                             3 August 2026
Intended status: Informational                                          
Expires: 4 February 2027

                    Delivered-Enc Email Header Field
                    draft-nurpmeso-delivered-enc-01

Abstract

   Cryptographically protected email aims in hiding and protecting.
   Extending this to an uppermost extend also for trace headers, and/or
   the transport layer, so that only directly involved hops, which need
   to have a notion to "know", the sending system and/or the receiving
   system thus, can interpret certain header information, can be
   important.  This document ensures that only the receiving system, in
   its desire to prevent email loops, can interpret the real content of
   the delivery notice header.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on 4 February 2027.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2026 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
   license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
   Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
   and restrictions with respect to this document.

Nurpmeso                 Expires 4 February 2027                [Page 1]
Internet-Draft      Delivered-Enc Email Header Field         August 2026

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  Encrypting information to protect email . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   3.  Delivered-Enc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   4.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   5.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   6.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3

1.  Introduction

   The SMTP[RFC5321] protocol documents in section 6.3 "Loop Detection"
   an approach to prevent infinite email loops.  In operational practice
   explicit trace header fields were in use for decades, to record
   delivery addresses, and to shortcut loop detection, and avoid simple
   counting mechanisms, until [RFC9228] created an IETF document that
   describes one of the solutions used in practice, the "Delivered-To
   Email Header Field".

2.  Encrypting information to protect email

   This document introduces a new header field that has the same
   purpose, and (likely) records the same information that RFC 9228
   describes, it however encourages systems to encrypt any content the
   header field might have, and produce and store solely BASE64[RFC4648]
   encoded output.  Only the local system (any party owning the
   encryption key) will be capable to decrypt the real content in this
   scenario, and therefore only interested parties for which the
   information makes sense.  This covers another aspect when
   cryptographically protecting email[RFC9788], for example in an end-
   to-end security scenario[RFC9787].

3.  Delivered-Enc

   The syntax of the header field is:

   "Delivered-Enc:" FWS BASE64 FWS CRLF ; BASE64 from RFC4648

4.  IANA Considerations

   This document would request registration of the header field name
   "Delivered-Enc".

5.  Security Considerations

   Encrypting trace header content may improve security.

Nurpmeso                 Expires 4 February 2027                [Page 2]
Internet-Draft      Delivered-Enc Email Header Field         August 2026

6.  Informative References

   [RFC4648]  Josefsson, S., "The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data
              Encodings", RFC 4648, DOI 10.17487/RFC4648, October 2006,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4648>.

   [RFC5321]  Klensin, J., "Simple Mail Transfer Protocol", RFC 5321,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC5321, October 2008,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5321>.

   [RFC9228]  Crocker, D., Ed., "Delivered-To Email Header Field",
              RFC 9228, DOI 10.17487/RFC9228, April 2022,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9228>.

   [RFC9787]  Gillmor, D. K., Ed., Melnikov, A., Ed., and B. Hoeneisen,
              Ed., "Guidance on End-to-End Email Security", RFC 9787,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC9787, August 2025,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9787>.

   [RFC9788]  Gillmor, D. K., Hoeneisen, B., and A. Melnikov, "Header
              Protection for Cryptographically Protected Email",
              RFC 9788, DOI 10.17487/RFC9788, August 2025,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9788>.

Author's Address

   Steffen Nurpmeso (editor)
   Email: steffen@sdaoden.eu

Nurpmeso                 Expires 4 February 2027                [Page 3]