%% You should probably cite rfc6596 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ohye-canonical-link-relation-04,
    number =    {draft-ohye-canonical-link-relation-04},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ohye-canonical-link-relation/04/},
    author =    {Maile Ohye and Joachim Kupke},
    title =     {{The Canonical Link Relation}},
    pagetotal = 7,
    year =      2011,
    month =     oct,
    day =       14,
    abstract =  {{[}RFC5988{]} specified a way to define relationships between links on the web. This document describes a new type of such relationship, "canonical," which designates the preferred URI from a set of identical or vastly similar ones. Editorial Note (To be removed by RFC Editor) Distribution of this document is unlimited. Comments should be sent to the IETF Apps-Discuss mailing list (see \textless{}https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss\textgreater{}).},
}