%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-mpls-psc-updates instead of this I-D.
@techreport{osborne-mpls-psc-updates-03,
    number =    {draft-osborne-mpls-psc-updates-03},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-osborne-mpls-psc-updates/03/},
    author =    {Eric Osborne},
    title =     {{Updates to PSC}},
    pagetotal = 8,
    year =      2013,
    month =     oct,
    day =       4,
    abstract =  {This document contains four updates to the Protection State Coordination (PSC) logic defined in RFC6378, "MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Linear Protection" . Two of the updates correct existing behavior. The third clears up a behavior which was not explained in the RFC, and the fourth adds rules around handling capabilities mismatches.},
}