Extended Options for DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)
draft-otis-dkim-options-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Douglas Otis | ||
| Last updated | 2005-12-27 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document describes options that extend protections offered by DKIM. These options include Binding-Advice & Role-Assertion, Opaque- Identifier, and an In-Channel check. The Binding-Advice & Role- Assertion offers guidance in isolating the source of a message, in addition to establishing message signature expectations. The Opaque- Identifier (O-ID) offers protection from replay abuse and intra- domain spoofing, even when email-addresses are not associated with the signing-domain. The In-Channel check provides a means to mitigate DNS lookups for avoiding possible message replay abuse.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)