%% You should probably cite draft-paillisse-nmrg-performance-digital-twin-02 instead of this revision.
@techreport{paillisse-nmrg-performance-digital-twin-01,
    number =    {draft-paillisse-nmrg-performance-digital-twin-01},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-paillisse-nmrg-performance-digital-twin/01/},
    author =    {Jordi Paillisse and Paul Almasan and Miquel Ferriol and Pere Barlet and Albert Cabellos and Shihan Xiao and Xiang Shi and Xiangle Cheng and Christopher Janz and Aihua Guo and Diego Perino and Diego Lopez and Antonio Pastor},
    title =     {{Performance-Oriented Digital Twins for Packet and Optical Networks}},
    pagetotal = 37,
    year =      2022,
    month =     oct,
    day =       24,
    abstract =  {This draft introduces the concept of a Network Digital Twin (NDT) for performance evaluation, a so-called Performance-Oriented Digital Twin (PODT). Two types of PODTs are described. The first, referred to as a Network Performance Digital Twin (NPDT), produces performance estimates (delay, jitter, loss) for a packet network with a specified topology, traffic demand, and routing and scheduling configuration. The second, referred to as an Optical Performance Digital Twin (OPDT), produces transmission performance estimates of an optical network with specified optical service topologies and network equipment types, topology and status. This draft also discusses interfaces to these digital twins, how these digital twins relate to existing control plane elements, and describes use cases for these digital twins, as well as possible implementation options.},
}