@techreport{palet-v6ops-rfc6177-bis-02,
    number =    {draft-palet-v6ops-rfc6177-bis-02},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-palet-v6ops-rfc6177-bis/02/},
    author =    {Jordi Palet Martinez and Rosalea Roberts},
    title =     {{IPv6 Address Assignment to End-Sites}},
    pagetotal = 11,
    year =      2018,
    month =     oct,
    day =       9,
    abstract =  {The Regional Internet Registries (RIRs) policies have different views regarding the recommendation of the prefix to be assigned to end- sites. However, all them allow up to a /48 without further justification and clearly state that the exact choice of how much address space should be assigned to end-sites is a decision of each operator. This document reviews the architectural and operational considerations of end-site assignments, and reiterates that assignment policy and guidelines belong to the RIR community. This revision is being made to emphasize that IPv6 protocol evolution requires an ever-increasing availability of subnets at the end-site, so policy should reflect that assignment of a single subnet is never recommended. This document obsoletes RFC6177 (IPv6 Address Assignment to End Sites).},
}