%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp instead of this I-D. @techreport{palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-03, number = {draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-03}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp/03/}, author = {Udayasree Palle and Dhruv Dhody and Yosuke Tanaka and Yuji Kamite and Zafar Ali}, title = {{Path Computation Element (PCE) Protocol Extensions for Stateful PCE usage for Point-to-Multipoint Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths}}, pagetotal = 22, year = 2014, month = jun, day = 6, abstract = {The Path Computation Element (PCE) has been identified as an appropriate technology for the determination of the paths of point- to-multipoint (P2MP) TE LSPs. {[}I-D.ietf-pce-stateful-pce-app{]} presents several use cases, demonstrating scenarios that benefit from the deployment of a stateful PCE. {[}I-D.ietf-pce-stateful-pce{]} provides the fundamental PCE communication Protocol (PCEP) extensions needed to support stateful PCE functions. This memo provides extensions required for PCEP so as to enable the usage of a stateful PCE capability in supporting point-to-multipoint (P2MP) TE LSPs.}, }