%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis instead of this I-D. @techreport{palleti-pce-rfc6006bis-01, number = {draft-palleti-pce-rfc6006bis-01}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-palleti-pce-rfc6006bis/01/}, author = {Quintin Zhao and Dhruv Dhody and Ramanjaneya Reddy Palleti and Daniel King and Fabien Verhaeghe and Tomonori Takeda and Julien Meuric}, title = {{Extensions to the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) for Point-to-Multipoint Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths}}, pagetotal = 40, year = 2017, month = mar, day = 10, abstract = {Point-to-point Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) and Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths (TE LSPs) may be established using signaling techniques, but their paths may first need to be determined. The Path Computation Element (PCE) has been identified as an appropriate technology for the determination of the paths of point-to-multipoint (P2MP) TE LSPs. This document describes extensions to the PCE communication Protocol (PCEP) to handle requests and responses for the computation of paths for P2MP TE LSPs. This document obsoletes RFC 6006.}, }